Target Corporation (TGT) Stock Analysis — Price Target, Avoid Rating & DCF Valuation (2026)

Target — mass market retailer struggling with traffic declines; beat Q1 but full-year guidance cautious

TGT Price Target & Rating

TGT's grade is Avoid, with moderate downside risk (CVaR -14.3%), and quality metrics (net margin 3%, ROE 22%). Target Corporation (TGT) trades at $127.98 with a valuation grade of Avoid: a trailing P/E of 16.9x at a 29% discount to sector median, net margins of 3.2%, a DCF-implied intrinsic range of $95–$160 suggesting a -0% margin of safety, beta 0.99 (moderate risk profile).

VALUEFAIR RANGEPREMIUM BEAR$95.08BULL$159.79 BASE$131 CURRENT$128 MOS vs BASE+2.3% DCF VALUATION RANGE · TGT
  • Valuation: Avoid grade — P/E 16.9x — DCF range $95–$160 implies -0% margin of safety
  • Risk: CVaR -14.3% (95th percentile, 1-month) indicates moderate tail exposure; beta of 0.99 amplifies broad market moves in both directions
  • Strengths: Size 4.0/5, 3% net margin, 22% ROE dominate the factor profile
  • Catalyst: Q2 FY2026 earnings; back-to-school sales data; tariff cost absorption progress
  • Bear catalyst: Close below $108 (comps going negative or tariff-driven gross margin compression below 28%)
TGT — Quantitative Snapshot June 2026
RatingAvoid
Price$127.98
Why AvoidTrading at a significant premium to intrinsic value — DCF and analyst consensus suggest limited margin of safety; valuation risk outweighs near-term upside
Tail riskCVaR -14.3% over one month at the 95th percentile
DCF range$95–$160 intrinsic range; margin of safety -0%
Best useCore large-cap Consumer Defensive holding — not a source of diversified sector exposure
Next watchEarnings delivery consistency and margin trajectory
TGT Quantitative Factor Radar Chart Pentagon radar chart showing TGT factor scores: Value 4.0, Quality 2.0, Momentum 3.0, Volatility 4.0, Size 4.0 — each scored on a 1 to 5 scale. VALUE 4.0 QUALITY 2.0 MOMENTUM 3.0 VOLATILITY 4.0 SIZE 4.0
Value
4.0 / 5
Quality
2.0 / 5
Momentum
3.0 / 5
Volatility
4.0 / 5
Size
4.0 / 5
TGT Key Metrics — Target Corporation 2026
MetricValue
Current Price$127.98
P/E Ratio (TTM)16.9x
Forward P/E14.4x
P/S Ratio0.5
EV/EBITDA8.9
Beta0.99
Net Margin3.2%
ROE22.0%
Debt/Equity117.5%
Dividend Yield3.56%
CVaR (95%, 1M)-14.3%
Market Cap$58.1B
Analyst View
Anton Ladnyi, CFA · A.L. Capital Advisory Updated 2026-06-11

Target — mass market retailer struggling with traffic declines; beat Q1 but full-year guidance cautious

↑ Bull Case
  • Q1 FY2026 revenue $25.4B (+6.7%, beat $24.66B); adj EPS $1.71 vs $1.46 (+17.1% beat)
  • FY2026 guidance raised to ~4% sales growth from flat — inflection signal
  • Target Circle loyalty program 120M+ members driving engagement and private label adoption
  • Owned brands (Up&Up, Cat&Jack, A New Day) 35% of sales at 4x the margin of national brands
  • Store remodel program improving per-square-foot productivity; pick-up and same-day growing
↓ Bear Case
  • Stock fell 4.9% on Q1 earnings day despite beat — market skeptical of trajectory
  • Consumer trade-down to Walmart/dollar stores intensifying; Target losing price perception battle
  • Tariff headwinds: 40%+ of merchandise imports from China; COGS pressure 2026-2027
  • Discretionary categories (apparel, home) still weak vs essentials; category mix unfavorable
  • Shrink (theft) losses elevated; operating costs not declining despite revenue growth
Catalyst: Comparable sales sustaining 5%+ growth and operating margin recovering toward 6%
Stop / exit: Close below $108 (comps going negative or tariff-driven gross margin compression below 28%)
The rating on TGT is driven by a factor profile that is genuinely mixed — there is no clean narrative here, which is itself a signal worth taking seriously. What I watch on this name is earnings consistency — specifically whether delivery against consensus is stable or deteriorating. That is usually where the rating gets confirmed or challenged before the price reflects it. The scenario that changes my read is a genuine valuation reset — not a small pullback, but a re-rating that reflects the actual risk profile. Until that happens, the risk/reward is not there.
— Anton Ladnyi, CFA
TGT Earnings History — EPS Surprise Rate 2026
QuarterEPS Est.EPS ActualSurprise
Q2 2026$1.46$1.71+17.3%
Q1 2026$2.16$2.44+13.0%
Q4 2025$1.71$1.78+4.1%
Q3 2025$2.03$2.05+0.8%
$0.00$0.90$1.80$2.70 +0.8%+4.1%+13.0%+17.3% Q3'25Q4'25Q1'26Q2'26 BEAT RATE4/4 ESTIMATEBEATMISS EPS ACTUAL vs ESTIMATE · TGT
TGT Forward EPS Consensus Estimates 2026
QuarterEPS Est.YoY EPSAnalysts
Q3 2026$2.03-1.0%31
Q4 2026$1.90+6.8%31
Q1 2027~$2.69+10.2%36
Q2 2027~$2.22+29.8%36
~ Estimated from annual consensus — not a direct analyst survey
$0.00$1.00$2.00$3.00$4.00 -1%+7%+10%+30% Q3 2026Q4 2026Q1 2027Q2 2027 ESTIMATE TRENDCONTRACTING CONSENSUS EPSANALYST RANGEBased on 36 analyst estimates EPS FORWARD ESTIMATES · TGT
TGT Peer Valuation Comparison 2026
TickerP/E (TTM)Fwd P/EBetaCVaR-95Net Margin
TGT16.9x14.4x0.99-14.3%3.2%
WMT42.3x36.7x0.60-10.1%3.1%
COST49.5x43.5x0.87-6.6%3.0%
AMZN31.6x24.1x1.44-16.6%12.2%
HD22.7x19.8x0.97-15.0%8.4%
Hover each scenario for detail · current price $127.98
BEAR$95BASE$145BULL$205 $128 DCF SCENARIO RANGE · TGT
Bear Case
$95
-25.8%
Fwd P/E: 10.7x
2 revenue CAGR · 11 exit multiple
Base Case
$145
+13.3%
Fwd P/E: 16.4x
5 revenue CAGR · 15 exit multiple
Bull Case
$205
+60.2%
Fwd P/E: 23.2x
8 revenue CAGR · 19 exit multiple
Pairwise Correlation Matrix — TGT vs HD vs COST vs WMT vs AMZN 5×5 pairwise correlation matrix showing co-movement between TGT, HD, COST, WMT, AMZN over a trailing 12-month window. TGT HD COST WMT AMZN TGT HD COST WMT AMZN 1.00 0.39 0.24 0.20 0.17 0.39 1.00 0.21 0.29 0.21 0.24 0.21 1.00 0.59 -0.00 0.20 0.29 0.59 1.00 -0.08 0.17 0.21 -0.00 -0.08 1.00
0 of 10 peer pairs correlated above 0.60 — diversification benefit within this cluster is structurally limited.
Extended Analysis — Buy, Hold or Sell? Risk Factors. Portfolio Fit.

Is TGT a buy, hold, or sell?

TGT carries a valuation grade of Avoid. At a trailing P/E of 16.9, the stock trades at a 29% discount to the Consumer Defensive sector median of 24.0x. Our discounted cash flow model produces an intrinsic range of $95–$160 — implying a -0% margin of safety at the current price of $127.98. The width of the DCF range reflects genuine uncertainty in the terminal growth rate assumption: the correct framework is a probability-weighted distribution over scenarios, not a single point estimate. See the DCF valuation framework for full methodology.

With a 12% beat rate on recent quarters, earnings predictability has been mixed. Analyst estimate revisions are trending upward.

What are TGT's key risk factors?

With a beta of 0.99, TGT exhibits a market-neutral risk profile relative to the broad market. The 95th-percentile CVaR of -14.3% on a one-month horizon should inform position sizing directly: at a 10% portfolio weight, this tail event contributes approximately 1.4% of total portfolio loss in the worst 5% of months. Net margins of 3.2% fall below the Consumer Defensive sector average of 12%, suggesting margin pressure. Return on equity of 22.0% suggests solid capital efficiency. Leverage is moderate with debt-to-equity at 118%.

Implied volatility of 2.2% is below realized volatility of 29.5%, potentially making options relatively cheap. Insiders have been net sellers to the tune of $33.3M recently. While routine dispositions are common, the magnitude bears watching. Short interest is low at 3.5% of float, suggesting limited bearish conviction.

How does TGT fit in a diversified portfolio?

At typical HENRY portfolio weights — 10–20% of the equity allocation — TGT carries a beta of 0.99, meaning it amplifies broad market moves proportionally. The appropriate weight is not a function of conviction alone, but of the full covariance structure across all avoidings. See the Ledoit-Wolf covariance framework for the methodology behind these calculations.

Among closely correlated names, TGT shows the strongest co-movement with HD (0.39), COST (0.24), WMT (0.20). Investors seeking diversification should note these correlation dynamics when constructing multi-asset portfolios.

True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure across all avoidings — not individual stock metrics. The Portfolio Health Check quantifies this at the portfolio level: it surfaces hidden concentration, marginal CVaR contributions, and the degree to which your overall allocation deviates from an optimal risk-adjusted mandate. The TGT analysis here is a single node in that larger structure.

Is TGT a buy or sell in 2026?

Target Corporation (TGT) carries a Avoid quantitative rating from A.L. Capital Advisory, derived from Discounted Cash Flow intrinsic value analysis, five-factor model scoring (Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, Size), and CVaR tail risk measurement. At $127.98, the DCF midpoint margin of safety is -0% (intrinsic value range: $95 bear – $160 bull). Composite factor score: 3.4/5. Strongest factor: Value (4.0/5). Weakest factor: Quality (2.0/5). Trailing P/E: 16.9x. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Portfolio Construction Framework →

What is the average analyst target price for TGT?

Wall Street consensus target for TGT: $131.66 (+2.9% upside from the current price of $127.98). The analyst target range spans $92.00 (most bearish) to $160.00 (most bullish). Consensus recommendation: Hold. Note that analyst price targets typically reflect a 12-month forward horizon and are derived from a blend of DCF, comparable-company, and sum-of-the-parts analysis. A.L. Capital Advisory’s quantitative Avoid rating is produced independently — from DCF intrinsic value, five-factor model scores, and CVaR tail risk — and does not mechanically track Street consensus. When the two diverge, the divergence itself is informative: it can reflect differences in time horizon, valuation methodology, or the degree to which the current price already discounts the consensus case. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Monte Carlo Simulation Framework →

How does TGT score on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size?

TGT five-factor scores (A.L. Capital Advisory, 1–5 scale): Value 4.0/5 (above average) — measures current price versus DCF intrinsic range and trailing earnings multiples; Quality 2.0/5 (below average) — captures profitability metrics including return on equity, net margin (ROE: 22.0%) and net margin (3.2%); Momentum 3.0/5 (neutral) — reflects recent price trajectory and earnings surprise consistency; Volatility 4.0/5 (above average) — inverse measure derived from beta, where lower historical volatility earns a higher score; Size 4.0/5 (above average) — market capitalisation rank (mega-cap $1T+ scores 5/5). Composite: 3.4/5. Factor scores above 4.0 signal a tailwind in that dimension; below 2.0 signals a material headwind. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Black-Litterman Model →

What is TGT's tail risk and CVaR?

The 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) for TGT on a one-month horizon is -14.3%. CVaR represents the expected average loss in the worst 5% of monthly outcomes — a more conservative tail risk measure than standard VaR, which only marks the loss threshold. Beta of 0.99 indicates broadly market-level volatility. For reference, a diversified S&P 500 ETF carries a one-month CVaR of roughly -8% to -12% in normal market conditions; individual equity CVaR is higher due to idiosyncratic risk. At the portfolio level, what matters is the marginal CVaR contribution of each holding — not its standalone figure. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies each position's marginal tail-risk contribution across your entire holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

What is TGT's intrinsic value and DCF price target?

A.L. Capital Advisory's DCF model produces an intrinsic value range of $95 (bear case) to $160 (bull case) for Target Corporation (TGT). At $127.98, the midpoint margin of safety is -0% (positive = discount to intrinsic mid; negative = premium). The bear-to-bull spread reflects genuine sensitivity to the two dominant DCF inputs: the terminal growth rate and WACC. Terminal value typically accounts for 60-80% of total intrinsic value in most equity DCF models, which is why a range is more analytically sound than a point estimate. The central analytical question is not what the DCF outputs as a single number but which growth trajectory the current market price already discounts. All DCF analysis follows CFA Institute standards and is conducted by Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

What would trigger a rating upgrade or downgrade for TGT?

Upgrade trigger: Upgrade to Strong Buy on evidence of accelerating earnings surprise magnitude combined with improvement in the Value factor score — specifically if the current 16.9x P/E is supported by an upward revision to DCF terminal growth assumptions. Downgrade trigger: Continued earnings misses or deteriorating balance sheet quality reducing the Quality factor score below 2.0/5. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Investment Policy Statement Framework →

How does TGT contribute to portfolio risk and diversification?

TGT carries a beta of 0.99 (moderate-volatility relative to the broad equity market). A beta above 1.0 means the position amplifies market moves in both directions at a typical portfolio weight. Strongest peer co-movement: HD (0.39), COST (0.24), WMT (0.20). Holding TGT alongside these names in the same portfolio increases concentration risk. True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure — a single stock's beta does not reveal its marginal contribution to portfolio tail loss. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies concentration risk (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index), pairwise correlations, and marginal CVaR contribution across all your holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Ledoit-Wolf Covariance Framework →

What quantitative methodology does A.L. Capital Advisory use to analyse TGT?

A.L. Capital Advisory analyses Target Corporation (TGT) using a four-component quantitative framework grounded in CFA Institute standards. (1) DCF Valuation: projects free cash flows under bear and bull assumptions, discounts at WACC to produce an intrinsic value range with margin-of-safety calculation. (2) Five-Factor Scoring: each equity is scored 1–5 on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size. (3) CVaR Tail Risk: 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk from historical simulation of daily returns on a one-month horizon. (4) Earnings Surprise Analysis: quarterly beat rate and magnitude are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality factor scores. The current Avoid rating for TGT is the output of applying this complete framework to current data. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →  ·  CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

Stress-Test This View Live

Run TGT in Asset Lens

Live DCF valuation, Monte Carlo simulation, options flow intelligence, and full factor decomposition — updated in real time. Free, no account required.

Launch Live Analysis →
Anton Ladnyi — Founder & Portfolio Architect, A.L. Capital Advisory, ex-Goldman Sachs, CFA
Anton Ladnyi, CFA
Founder & Portfolio Architect — A.L. Capital Advisory
Ex-Goldman Sachs Equity Research · Ex-J.P. Morgan Wealth Management · CFA Charterholder
Legal Disclaimer & Important Notices

This analysis is produced using a systematic quantitative framework applied to market data and does not constitute investment advice. Prose commentary is AI-assisted and generated from structured quantitative inputs. All data and metrics are as of 2026-06-11 and are point-in-time estimates subject to revision without notice. CVaR figures are based on historical simulation and do not guarantee future outcomes. DCF ranges and upgrade/downgrade triggers are forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and may not materialise. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This analysis does not account for individual circumstances, tax position, or investment objectives — consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. This content is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute regulated investment advice under MiFID II or FCA guidelines. This content is not intended for US persons or residents of jurisdictions where its distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. This service is not directed at residents of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, or Poland. The author may hold long or short positions in securities mentioned in this analysis. Nothing on this page represents a solicitation to buy or sell any security. A.L. Capital Advisory is an independent private advisory practice and is not affiliated with Target Corporation.

CFA Portfolio Advisory — TGT Discuss this analysis, position sizing, or your full portfolio mandate with Anton Ladnyi, CFA.