Thales SA (THLEF) Stock Analysis - DCF Valuation & AI Disruption Risk

THLEF — H1 2026 results (July 23): new orders reached €12.47B for the first six months, up 21% YoY, confirming the Defence order momentum flagged after Q1's 75% YoY order growth — order book conversion pace remains the one item to watch.

Quantitative model rating — not individualized investment advice.

How Is This Rating Calculated?

1. Margin of safety → quantitative grade

Blended valuation margin-of-safety bands
Margin of safetyQuant gradeScore
MOS > 20.00%Strong Buy5.0
10.00% < MOS ≤ 20.00%Buy4.0
−10.00% < MOS ≤ 10.00%Hold3.0
−20.00% < MOS ≤ −10.00%Reduce2.0
MOS ≤ −20.00%Avoid1.0

2. Auto fundamental penalty

Automatic fundamental-penalty rules
RuleThresholdPenalty
P/E extremeForward (or trailing) P/E > 80x−1.0
P/E elevatedForward (or trailing) P/E 50–80x−0.5
Earnings deterioration, significantEarnings growth < −20%−1.0
Earnings deterioration, mildEarnings growth −5% to −20%−0.5
Stagnant top-lineRevenue growth < 3%−0.5
Unsustainable dividendPayout ratio > 120%−0.5

3. Thesis conviction modifier

Analyst-conviction modifier scale
Conviction levelModifier
Very High+1.00
High+0.60
Medium+0.00
Low-0.60
Very Low-1.00

4. Composite score → final grade

Composite score → grade thresholds
Composite score rangeGrade
Score ≥ 4.50Strong Buy
3.50 ≤ Score < 4.50Buy
2.50 ≤ Score < 3.50Hold
1.50 ≤ Score < 2.50Reduce
Score < 1.50Avoid
THLEF Price Target & Rating

THLEF's quantitative grade is Avoid, with moderate downside risk (CVaR -16.4%), and quality metrics (net margin 7%, ROE 19%). Thales SA (THLEF) trades at $312.59 with a Avoid composite rating: a trailing P/E of 36.1x at a 64% premium to sector median, net margins of 6.6%, a blended fair-value range of $187–$324 suggesting a -27% margin of safety, beta 0.12 (defensive risk profile).

THLEF's blended fair-value range is $187–$324 (base case $247), against a current price of $312.59.

VALUEFAIR RANGEPREMIUM BEAR$187.46BULL$324.31 BASE$247 CURRENT$313 UPSIDE TO BASE-21.0% DCF VALUATION RANGE · THLEF
THLEF blended fair-value gauge — bear case $187, base case $247, bull case $324, current price $312.59.
Price & DCF data as of

Drag to simulate THLEF's price moving between the blended bear ($187) and bull ($324) fair-value anchors — left for a price fall, right for a rise — and see how the margin of safety vs A.L. Capital Advisory's $247 blended base-case fair value changes. Starting point: the page's as-of price of $312.59 on 2026-08-08.

DCF Assumptions
DCF assumptions by scenario
InputBearBaseBull
Stage-1 (near-term) growth3.15%7.00%10.50%
Terminal growth2.20%2.20%2.20%
CAPM cost of equity (discount rate)8.00%7.41%6.82%
Forecast horizon5 years5 years5 years
  • Valuation: Avoid grade — P/E 36.1x — blended fair-value range $187–$324 implies -27% margin of safety
  • Risk: CVaR -16.4% (95th percentile, 1-month) indicates moderate tail exposure; beta of 0.12 amplifies broad market moves in both directions
  • Strengths: Size 4.0/5, 7% net margin, 19% ROE dominate the factor profile
  • Catalyst: H2 2026 order intake pace vs the H1 €12.47B base; Cyber & Digital segment stabilisation signal; full-year EBIT margin guidance confirmation (12.6-12.8% target).
  • Bear catalyst: Full-year organic guidance cut below +4%; order book falls below €48B; Cyber & Digital accelerates its decline above -10%
THLEF — Quantitative Snapshot August 2026
RatingAvoid
Price$312.59
Why AvoidTrading at a significant premium to intrinsic value — DCF and analyst consensus suggest limited margin of safety; valuation risk outweighs near-term upside
Main riskPremium multiple (36.1x P/E) demands consistent delivery
Tail riskCVaR -16.4% over one month at the 95th percentile
Blended fair-value range$187–$324 blended fair-value range; margin of safety -27%
Best useCore large-cap Industrials holding — not a source of diversified sector exposure
Next watchEarnings delivery and valuation re-rating catalysts

THLEF's composite five-factor score is 3.2/5, led by Volatility (5.0/5) and weakest on Value (2.0/5).

THLEF Quantitative Factor Radar Chart Pentagon radar chart showing THLEF factor scores: Value 2.0, Quality 2.0, Momentum 3.0, Volatility 5.0, Size 4.0 — each scored on a 1 to 5 scale. VALUE 2.0 QUALITY 2.0 MOMENTUM 3.0 VOLATILITY 5.0 SIZE 4.0
THLEF five-factor radar — Value 2.0, Quality 2.0, Momentum 3.0, Volatility 5.0, Size 4.0 (out of 5).
Value
2.0 / 5
Quality
2.0 / 5
Momentum
3.0 / 5
Volatility
5.0 / 5
Size
4.0 / 5
THLEF Five-Factor Quantitative Scores
FactorScore
Value2.0 / 5
Quality2.0 / 5
Momentum3.0 / 5
Volatility5.0 / 5
Size4.0 / 5
AI Disruption Risk: Moderate

Thales posted H1 2026 sales of €10.9bn (up 7.8% organically) with order intake growing 22% in the half, guiding full-year organic sales growth of 6-7%, and is embedding AI directly into its core defence platforms: the Rafale F5 standard will carry AI-augmented sensor fusion and control architecture for accompanying combat drones under a formal AI partnership with Dassault, while Ground Master radars and the newly unveiled RapidStriker counter-drone system address the same drone-proliferation threat driving demand sector-wide. The company is also moving to acquire Exail, aiming to build a leading position in autonomous underwater warfare and inertial navigation. Because Thales is positioning itself to own software/AI architecture on programs like Rafale rather than ceding that layer to outside entrants, its disruption exposure is more moderate than pure hardware primes, with the real risks being integration execution on the Exail deal and the multi-year timeline (Rafale F5 not fielded until 2030) leaving a gap where software-native competitors could establish incumbency elsewhere. The watch trigger is Rafale F5 AI sensor-fusion program milestones and the pace of Exail integration.

THLEF Key Metrics — Thales SA 2026
MetricValue
Current Price$312.59
P/E Ratio (TTM)36.1x
Forward P/E30.6x
P/S Ratio2.8
EV/EBITDA21.1
Beta0.12
Net Margin6.6%
ROE19.4%
Debt/Equity69.5%
Dividend Yield1.50%
CVaR (95%, 1M)-16.4%
Market Cap$64.2B
1-Month CVaR Methodology
  • Lookback: most recent 1 year of daily prices.
  • Return input: daily log returns on dividend/split-adjusted close prices.
  • Horizon construction: rolling, overlapping 21-trading-day (~1 calendar month) sums of daily log returns.
  • Confidence level: 95% (worst 5% of the resulting rolling-month observations).
  • Quantile convention: floor-based cutoff — the worst floor(N × 0.05) rolling-month observations (minimum 1), not a rounded or interpolated percentile.
  • CVaR: arithmetic mean of that worst-5% tail, expressed as a percentage.
  • Corporate actions: reflected via adjusted-close pricing (dividends and splits are accounted for).
1M CVaR-95 by lookback window
Method1M CVaR-95
Trailing 1-year historical-16.4%
Trailing 3-year historical-14.2%
Trailing 5-year historical-14.2%
Historical Simulation · Daily Log Returns
THLEF — Daily Return Distribution
Thales SA  ·  250 trading days  ·  CVaR illustrated on real data
Aug 2025 – Aug 2026 Daily log returns
95%
-4.69%
1-Day VaR · 95%
95th-percentile loss threshold
-5.89%
1-Day CVaR · 95%
Avg loss in tail
13
Days in tail
of 250 sessions
250
Daily returns
Aug 2025 – Aug 2026
ℹ️
Risk Framework · A.L. Capital Advisory
CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology
Why variance understates downside risk in non-normal distributions — and how CVaR corrects that blind spot
Analyst View
Anton Ladnyi, CFA · A.L. Capital Advisory Updated 2026-08-08

THLEF — H1 2026 results (July 23): new orders reached €12.47B for the first six months, up 21% YoY, confirming the Defence order momentum flagged after Q1's 75% YoY order growth — order book conversion pace remains the one item to watch.

↑ Bull Case
  • H1 2026 actual: new orders of €12.47B, up 21% YoY, extends the Q1 order surge (+75% YoY in Defence) through the first half — order momentum is proving durable, not a one-quarter spike.
  • €53.3B order book (FY2025 year-end) covers 2.4x annual revenue; Defence order intake up 75% YoY in Q1 2026 driven by air surveillance and underwater mine warfare
  • FY2025 record FCF £2.577B (+27%) enabled net debt reduction from €3.0B to €1.6B — balance sheet rapidly strengthening
  • Q1 2026 organic revenue +9.7% beat consensus of +5.5%; 7 large orders >€100M in the quarter
  • Defence segment revenue €12.2B in FY2025 (+11.5%); management guiding majority of recent geopolitical demand impact in H2 2026 and 2027
  • 2028 EBIT margin target 13-14% (vs 12.4% in FY2025) with €25B+ revenue implies significant earnings power step-up
  • Cyber & Digital stabilising — though -4.3% in FY2025, this drag should moderate as payment card market recovers
  • EPS surged +61.8% TTM — strongest fundamental turnaround in European defense peer group; FCF yield 5.16% (highest among Thales/Leonardo/Rheinmetall peers); P/E compressed to 29.6x on earnings acceleration; beta 0.76 makes it the lowest-volatility European defense name; analysts calling it top pick for value-oriented defense investors
↓ Bear Case
  • Q1 2026 order intake €4.65B missed consensus €4.85B — stock fell 3% despite revenue beat; order conversion pace a concern
  • Cyber & Digital segment -4.3% in FY2025: payment cards and digital services in structural deceleration
  • Beta 0.15 (very low volatility) means limited upside participation in risk-on defence rallies; more defensive-growth profile
  • Geopolitical risk: significant Middle East exposure; escalation or de-escalation both create demand timing uncertainty
Catalyst: Defence order intake book-to-bill above 1.5x for two consecutive quarters + Cyber returning to positive growth
Model downgrade conditions: Full-year organic guidance cut below +4%; order book falls below €48B; Cyber & Digital accelerates its decline above -10%
The rating on THLEF is driven by a factor profile that is genuinely mixed — there is no clean narrative here, which is itself a signal worth taking seriously. What I watch on this name is earnings consistency — specifically whether delivery against consensus is stable or deteriorating. That is usually where the rating gets confirmed or challenged before the price reflects it. The scenario that changes my read is a genuine valuation reset — not a small pullback, but a re-rating that reflects the actual risk profile. Until that happens, the risk/reward is not there.
— Anton Ladnyi, CFA
THLEF Earnings History — EPS Surprise Rate 2026
QuarterEPS Est. (consensus)EPS Actual (adjusted, consensus basis)Surprise
Q2 2026$2.35
Q4 2025$4.91
Q2 2025$3.22
Q4 2024$1.96
$0.00$2.00$4.00$6.00 Q4'24Q2'25Q4'25Q2'26 BEAT RATE0/4 ESTIMATEBEATMISS EPS ACTUAL vs ESTIMATE · THLEF
THLEF quarterly EPS — estimate vs. actual.
THLEF Peer Valuation Comparison 2026
TickerP/E (TTM)Fwd P/EBeta1M CVaR-95Net Margin
THLEF36.1x30.6x0.12-16.4%6.6%
BAESY31.9x22.6x-0.05-15.6%7.2%
EADSY28.3x26.2x0.88-16.2%7.7%
RHM.DE51.0x21.4x-26.7%6.5%
LDO.MI29.8x20.5x0.38-14.7%5.5%
Revenue growth × exit multiple (editorial, not mechanically reproducible from disclosed inputs) · hover each scenario for detail · current price $312.59
BEAR$44BASE$70BULL$95 $313 ANALYST SCENARIO RANGE · THLEF
Bear Case
$44
-85.9%
Implied NTM P/E: 4.3x (target ÷ next-4Q consensus EPS — distinct from the exit multiple below, which is applied to a later-year EPS estimate)
4.0 revenue CAGR · 18.0 exit multiple
Base Case
$70
-77.6%
Implied NTM P/E: 6.9x (target ÷ next-4Q consensus EPS — distinct from the exit multiple below, which is applied to a later-year EPS estimate)
8.0 revenue CAGR · 24.0 exit multiple
Bull Case
$95
-69.6%
Implied NTM P/E: 9.3x (target ÷ next-4Q consensus EPS — distinct from the exit multiple below, which is applied to a later-year EPS estimate)
12.0 revenue CAGR · 29.0 exit multiple

1 of 10 peer pairs correlated above 0.60, indicating meaningful historical diversification across the selected names, although all remain exposed to common equity, sector and macro factors.

Pairwise Correlation Matrix — THLEF vs BAESY vs EADSY vs LDO.MI vs RHM.DE 5×5 pairwise correlation matrix showing co-movement between THLEF, BAESY, EADSY, LDO.MI, RHM.DE over a trailing 12-month window. THLEF BAESY EADSY LDO.MI RHM.DE THLEF BAESY EADSY LDO.MI RHM.DE 1.00 0.35 0.23 0.18 0.16 0.35 1.00 0.41 0.34 0.33 0.23 0.41 1.00 0.15 0.14 0.18 0.34 0.15 1.00 0.73 0.16 0.33 0.14 0.73 1.00
THLEF pairwise correlation heatmap across 5 peers — 1 of 10 pairs above 0.60.
1 of 10 peer pairs correlated above 0.60, indicating meaningful historical diversification across the selected names, although all remain exposed to common equity, sector and macro factors.
Extended Analysis — Buy, Hold or Sell? Risk Factors. Portfolio Fit.

Is THLEF a buy, hold, or sell?

THLEF carries a quantitative grade of Avoid. The trailing P/E of 36.1 sits 64% above the Industrials sector median of 22.0x — a premium that demands sustained earnings delivery. Our two-stage, EPS-based DCF model produces a pure model range of $187–$324. After blending with Street consensus targets, the displayed fair-value range is $187–$324 — implying a -27% margin of safety vs. blended base fair value at the current price of $312.59. The width of the range reflects genuine uncertainty in the terminal growth rate assumption: the correct framework is a probability-weighted distribution over scenarios, not a single point estimate. See the DCF valuation framework for full methodology.

Analyst estimate revisions are trending upward.

What are THLEF's key risk factors?

With a beta of 0.12, THLEF exhibits a low-volatility risk profile relative to the broad market. The 95th-percentile CVaR of -16.4% on a one-month horizon should inform position sizing directly: at a 10% portfolio weight, this standalone tail outcome corresponds to approximately 1.6% of portfolio value before accounting for correlations with other holdings — not a marginal portfolio CVaR contribution, which depends on the full covariance structure. Net margins of 6.6% fall below the Industrials sector average of 11%, suggesting margin pressure. Return on equity of 19.4% suggests solid capital efficiency. The balance sheet is conservatively leveraged at 70% debt-to-equity.

How does THLEF fit in a diversified portfolio?

At typical HENRY portfolio weights — 10–20% of the equity allocation — THLEF carries a beta of 0.12, meaning it amplifies broad market moves proportionally. The appropriate weight is not a function of conviction alone, but of the full covariance structure across all holdings. See the Ledoit-Wolf covariance framework for the methodology behind these calculations.

Among closely correlated names, THLEF shows the strongest co-movement with BAESY (0.35), EADSY (0.23), LDO.MI (0.18). Investors seeking diversification should note these correlation dynamics when constructing multi-asset portfolios.

True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure across all holdings — not individual stock metrics. The Portfolio Health Check quantifies this at the portfolio level: it surfaces hidden concentration, marginal CVaR contributions, and the degree to which your overall allocation deviates from an optimal risk-adjusted mandate. The THLEF analysis here is a single node in that larger structure.

What is THLEF's AI-Era Durability & Disruption Risk Score?

Thales posted H1 2026 sales of €10.9bn (up 7.8% organically) with order intake growing 22% in the half, guiding full-year organic sales growth of 6-7%, and is embedding AI directly into its core defence platforms: the Rafale F5 standard will carry AI-augmented sensor fusion and control architecture for accompanying combat drones under a formal AI partnership with Dassault, while Ground Master radars and the newly unveiled RapidStriker counter-drone system address the same drone-proliferation threat driving demand sector-wide. The company is also moving to acquire Exail, aiming to build a leading position in autonomous underwater warfare and inertial navigation. Because Thales is positioning itself to own software/AI architecture on programs like Rafale rather than ceding that layer to outside entrants, its disruption exposure is more moderate than pure hardware primes, with the real risks being integration execution on the Exail deal and the multi-year timeline (Rafale F5 not fielded until 2030) leaving a gap where software-native competitors could establish incumbency elsewhere. The watch trigger is Rafale F5 AI sensor-fusion program milestones and the pace of Exail integration.

What is THLEF's intrinsic value and DCF price target?

A.L. Capital Advisory's model produces a blended fair-value range (25% pure DCF, 75% analyst consensus for well-covered names) of $187 (bear case) to $324 (bull case) for Thales SA (THLEF). At $312.59, the margin of safety vs. blended base case is -27% (positive = discount to fair value; negative = premium). The bear-to-bull spread reflects genuine sensitivity to the two dominant DCF inputs: the terminal growth rate and the CAPM cost of equity (this model discounts EPS, an equity-level metric, so the cost of equity rather than a debt-weighted WACC is the applicable discount rate). Terminal value typically accounts for 60-80% of total intrinsic value in most equity DCF models, which is why a range is more analytically sound than a point estimate. The central analytical question is not what the DCF outputs as a single number but which growth trajectory the current market price already discounts. All DCF analysis follows CFA Institute standards and is conducted by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

Is THLEF a buy or sell in 2026?

Thales SA (THLEF) carries a Avoid quantitative rating from A.L. Capital Advisory, set by Discounted Cash Flow margin-of-safety band with no analyst-conviction overlay applied. Five-factor model scoring (Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, Size) and CVaR tail risk measurement are shown separately on the page. At $312.59, the margin of safety vs. blended base fair value is -27% (blended fair-value range: $187 bear – $324 bull). That places the current price in the Fair Range zone of A.L. Capital Advisory's DCF framework, which sets the quantitative grade component that determines this rating. Composite factor score: 3.2/5. Strongest factor: Volatility (5.0/5). Weakest factor: Value (2.0/5). Trailing P/E: 36.1x. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Rating Methodology (this page) →

How does THLEF score on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size?

THLEF five-factor scores (A.L. Capital Advisory, 1–5 scale): Value 2.0/5 (below average) — measures the trailing P/E multiple versus the sector median (not the DCF or blended fair-value range, which are separate metrics on this page); Quality 2.0/5 (below average) — captures profitability metrics including return on equity (ROE: 19.4%) and net margin (6.6%) — sustained above-peer ROE and margins are the model's proxy for economic moat and pricing power; Momentum 3.0/5 (neutral) — reflects recent price trajectory and earnings surprise consistency; Volatility 5.0/5 (strong) — inverse measure derived from beta, where lower historical volatility earns a higher score; Size 4.0/5 (above average) — market capitalisation rank (mega-cap $1T+ scores 5/5). Composite: 3.2/5. Factor scores above 4.0 signal a tailwind in that dimension; below 2.0 signals a material headwind. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory.

What is THLEF's tail risk and CVaR?

The 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) for THLEF on a one-month horizon is -16.4%. CVaR represents the expected average loss in the worst 5% of monthly outcomes — a more conservative tail risk measure than standard VaR, which only marks the loss threshold. Beta of 0.12 indicates below-market systematic sensitivity — beta measures historical sensitivity to market moves, not total volatility. For reference, a diversified S&P 500 ETF carries a one-month CVaR of roughly -8% to -12% in normal market conditions; individual equity CVaR is higher due to idiosyncratic risk. At the portfolio level, what matters is the marginal CVaR contribution of each holding — not its standalone figure. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies each position's marginal tail-risk contribution across your entire holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

What would trigger a rating upgrade or downgrade for THLEF?

Upgrade trigger: Upgrade to Strong Buy on evidence of accelerating earnings surprise magnitude combined with improvement in the Value factor score — specifically if the current 36.1x P/E is supported by an upward revision to DCF terminal growth assumptions. Downgrade trigger: Continued earnings misses or deteriorating balance sheet quality reducing the Quality factor score below 2.0/5. These triggers are reassessed each time the underlying fundamentals, price, or earnings data refresh — the current Avoid rating is not held on a fixed review calendar. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Rating Methodology (this page) →

How does THLEF contribute to portfolio risk and diversification?

THLEF carries a beta of 0.12 (low-volatility / defensive relative to the broad equity market). A beta above 1.0 means the position amplifies market moves in both directions at a typical portfolio weight. Strongest peer co-movement: BAESY (0.35), EADSY (0.23), LDO.MI (0.18). Holding THLEF alongside these names in the same portfolio increases concentration risk. True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure — a single stock's beta does not reveal its marginal contribution to portfolio tail loss. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies concentration risk (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index), pairwise correlations, and marginal CVaR contribution across all your holdings. If a single position such as this one makes up an outsized share of your net worth — employer stock, RSUs, or concentrated equity compensation — a Strategic Session builds the sequencing plan and the written allocation that follows from it. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Ledoit-Wolf Covariance Framework →

What quantitative methodology does A.L. Capital Advisory use to analyse THLEF?

A.L. Capital Advisory analyses Thales SA (THLEF) using a four-part quantitative research framework grounded in CFA Institute standards (not all four parts feed the composite rating formula directly — see below). (1) DCF Valuation: a two-stage earnings-based DCF that projects EPS (not free cash flow) under bear and bull assumptions, discounts at the CAPM cost of equity (the applicable rate for an equity-level metric like EPS, not a debt-weighted WACC) to produce an intrinsic value range with margin-of-safety calculation. (2) Five-Factor Scoring: each equity is scored 1–5 on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size. (3) CVaR Tail Risk: 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk from historical simulation of daily returns on a one-month horizon. (4) Earnings Surprise Analysis: quarterly beat rate and magnitude, shown for context alongside the factor scores. The current Avoid composite rating for THLEF is calculated separately from this broader framework: it consists of a Avoid quantitative grade, any automatic fundamental penalty, and a disclosed qualitative analyst-conviction overlay — see this page's Rating Methodology section for the exact formula. Five-factor scoring, CVaR and earnings surprise analysis below are supporting research diagnostics shown separately on this page; they are not direct numerical inputs into this specific composite-rating calculation. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →  ·  CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

Stress-Test This View Live

Run THLEF in Asset Lens

Live DCF valuation, Monte Carlo simulation, options flow intelligence, and full factor decomposition — updated in real time. Free, no account required.

Launch Live Analysis →
Anton Ladnyi — Founder & Portfolio Architect, A.L. Capital Advisory, ex-Goldman Sachs, CFA
Anton Ladnyi, CFA
Founder & Portfolio Architect — A.L. Capital Advisory
Ex-Goldman Sachs Equity Research · Ex-J.P. Morgan Wealth Management · CFA Charterholder
Data & Sources
THLEF data sources and as-of dates
MetricSourceObservation basis
[1] Company financials & management guidanceSEC EDGAR filings (all forms — 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K earnings releases) →Most recent reported quarter: 2026-06-30
[2] Market priceYahoo Finance quote →2026-08-08T10:11:22+00:00 (UTC) · Market closed (weekend)
[3] Consensus EPS & analyst price targetsYahoo Finance analyst estimates →Retrieved 2026-08-08T10:11:22+00:00 (UTC); see per-quarter analyst counts in Earnings Forecast; individual target ages/dates are not disclosed by the data provider
[4] Insider transactionsYahoo Finance insider transactions →Disclosed transaction dates shown inline where cited (SEC Form 4 basis)
[5] Short interestYahoo Finance key statistics →Most recent exchange settlement date on file with the data provider (exact settlement date not exposed by the provider's API; retrieved 2026-08-08T10:11:22+00:00 UTC)
[6] DCF valuation, five-factor model & composite ratingA.L. Capital Advisory proprietary model →Calculated 2026-08-08T10:11:22+00:00 (UTC); see Rating Methodology above for the exact formula
Legal Disclaimer & Important Notices

This analysis is produced using a systematic quantitative framework applied to market data and does not constitute investment advice. Prose commentary is AI-assisted and generated from structured quantitative inputs. All data and metrics are as of 2026-08-08 and are point-in-time estimates subject to revision without notice. CVaR figures are based on historical simulation and do not guarantee future outcomes. DCF ranges and upgrade/downgrade triggers are forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and may not materialise. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This analysis does not account for individual circumstances, tax position, or investment objectives — consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. This content is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute regulated investment advice under MiFID II or FCA guidelines. This content is not intended for US persons or residents of jurisdictions where its distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. This service is not directed at residents of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, or Poland. The author may hold long or short positions in securities mentioned in this analysis. Nothing on this page represents a solicitation to buy or sell any security. A.L. Capital Advisory is an independent private advisory practice and is not affiliated with Thales SA.

CFA Portfolio Advisory — THLEF Discuss this analysis, position sizing, or your full portfolio mandate with Anton Ladnyi, CFA.