We use cookies for behaviour analytics. Learn more
Technology · Equity Analysis
Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) Stock Analysis — Price Target, Hold Rating & DCF Valuation (2026)
By Anton Ladnyi, CFA · ex-Goldman Sachs · ex-J.P. MorganPublished Updated
SNOW — agentic AI data platform at $235 post Analyst Day: FY2028 product revenue $5.84B (raised), margin 13.5%, $6B AWS partnership, Natoma AI acquisition, path to GAAP profitability Q4 FY2028
SNOW Price Target & Rating
SNOW's quantitative grade is Hold, with elevated downside risk (CVaR -30.1%), and quality metrics (net margin -24%, ROE -55%). Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) trades at $239.66 with a valuation grade of Hold: net margins of -23.8%, a DCF-implied intrinsic range of $90–$393 suggesting a +1% margin of safety, beta 1.35 (moderate risk profile).
DCF Valuation Range
Key Takeaways
Valuation: Hold grade — DCF range $90–$393 implies +1% margin of safety
Risk: CVaR -30.1% (95th percentile, 1-month) indicates moderate tail exposure; beta of 1.35 amplifies broad market moves in both directions
Strengths: Size 4.0/5, -24% net margin, -55% ROE dominate the factor profile
Catalyst: Q2 FY2027 earnings ~August 2026 — product revenue vs $1.42B guide; Cortex AI revenue attach rate; NRR trajectory
Bear catalyst: NRR falls below 120% for two consecutive quarters; FY2028 product revenue guidance cut from $5.84B; Databricks announces direct SNOW customer poaching above 10% churn
SNOW — Quantitative SnapshotJune 2026
RatingHold
Price$239.66
Why HoldBalanced risk/reward — neither compellingly cheap nor expensive at current levels
Main riskElevated tail risk — CVaR -30.1% on a one-month horizon
Tail riskCVaR -30.1% over one month at the 95th percentile
DCF range$90–$393 intrinsic range; margin of safety +1%
Best useCore large-cap Technology holding — not a source of diversified sector exposure
Next watchEarnings delivery consistency and margin trajectory
Quantitative Factor Profile
Value
3.0 / 5
Quality
1.0 / 5
Momentum
3.0 / 5
Volatility
2.5 / 5
Size
4.0 / 5
Key Metrics
SNOW Key Metrics — Snowflake Inc. 2026
Metric
Value
Current Price
$239.66
Forward P/E
89.4x
P/S Ratio
16.5
EV/EBITDA
-73.6
Beta
1.35
Net Margin
-23.8%
ROE
-54.9%
Debt/Equity
142.9%
CVaR (95%, 1M)
-30.1%
Market Cap
$83.1B
Analyst View
Anton Ladnyi, CFA · A.L. Capital AdvisoryUpdated 2026-06-11
Rating Rationale
SNOW — agentic AI data platform at $235 post Analyst Day: FY2028 product revenue $5.84B (raised), margin 13.5%, $6B AWS partnership, Natoma AI acquisition, path to GAAP profitability Q4 FY2028
Investment Thesis
↑ Bull Case
Analyst Day (June 2): FY2028 product revenue raised to $5.84B; non-GAAP operating margin raised to 13.5% (from 12.5%); path to GAAP profitability announced for Q4 FY2028
$6B expanded AWS collaboration — positions SNOW as enterprise AI data governance control plane with hyperscaler distribution
Natoma acquisition adds AI agent platform; Cortex AI pipeline attracting Fortune 500 enterprises for AI governance use cases
Stock surged +8.8% to $278 on Analyst Day; 30+ analysts raised targets; median analyst PT lifted to $280 from $230
Snowflake closed record $400M single-customer deal in Q4 FY2026; Q1 FY2027 product revenue $1.33B (+34% YoY, best sequential dollar growth in company history); NRR ticked up to 126%; RPO grew 38% to $9.21B — demand reacceleration visible
↓ Bear Case
Stock pulled back from $278 Analyst Day high to $235 — market skeptical on margin durability and Databricks competitive intensity
Databricks remains private with aggressive enterprise wins; hyperscaler native data lakes (BigQuery, Redshift Serverless) free at the margin
GAAP profitability not until Q4 FY2028; SBC still ~25% of revenue creating ongoing dilution
NRR of 126% still below 130%+ peak; consumption model creates revenue volatility if AI workloads consolidate onto hyperscaler native tools
What Changes the Rating
↑Catalyst:NRR recovers above 130% for two consecutive quarters OR Cortex AI revenue crosses $200M annualized; AWS partnership drives 10+ new Fortune 500 wins disclosed
↓Stop / exit:NRR falls below 120% for two consecutive quarters; FY2028 product revenue guidance cut from $5.84B; Databricks announces direct SNOW customer poaching above 10% churn
Anton’s personal note
Hold means what it says here — I am not selling, but I am not buying either. The risk/reward at current prices is roughly balanced, and roughly balanced is not enough reason to deploy fresh capital. The tail risk is the thing. A CVaR of -30.1% is not a number to dismiss — it means in bad months this position can move severely, and that has to be reflected in how much you size it, not just whether you own it at all. Re-accelerating earnings surprise magnitude would shift my view constructive. Continued compression of beat magnitude at this multiple would move me toward a reduce.
— Anton Ladnyi, CFA
Earnings History
SNOW Earnings History — EPS Surprise Rate 2026
Quarter
EPS Est.
EPS Actual
Surprise
Q2 2026
$0.32
$0.39
+21.9% ✓
Q1 2026
$0.27
$0.32
+17.8% ✓
Q4 2025
$0.31
$0.35
+12.5% ✓
Q3 2025
$0.27
$0.35
+31.4% ✓
Quarterly EPS — Estimate vs Actual
Earnings Projections
SNOW Forward EPS Consensus Estimates 2026
Quarter
EPS Est.
YoY EPS
Analysts
Q3 2026
$0.45
+28.6%
43
Q4 2026
$0.52
+47.1%
42
Q1 2027
~$0.58
+81.2%
49
Q2 2027
~$0.67
+71.8%
50
~ Estimated from annual consensus — not a direct analyst survey
Quantitative grade: Hold • CVaR from one-year daily history · historical simulation
DCF Scenario Analysis
Hover each scenario for detail · current price $239.66
▼
Bear Case
$115
-52.0%
Fwd P/E: 51.9x
18% revenue CAGR · 15 exit multiple
◆
Base Case
$250
+4.3%
Fwd P/E: 112.9x
26% revenue CAGR · 20 exit multiple
▲
Bull Case
$440
+83.6%
Fwd P/E: 198.6x
35% revenue CAGR · 30 exit multiple
Pairwise Correlation Matrix
0 of 10 peer pairs correlated above 0.60 — diversification benefit within this cluster is structurally limited.
Extended Analysis — Buy, Hold or Sell? Risk Factors. Portfolio Fit.
Is SNOW a buy, hold, or sell?
SNOW carries a valuation grade of Hold. Our discounted cash flow model produces an intrinsic range of $90–$393 — implying a +1% margin of safety at the current price of $239.66. The width of the DCF range reflects genuine uncertainty in the terminal growth rate assumption: the correct framework is a probability-weighted distribution over scenarios, not a single point estimate. See the DCF valuation framework for full methodology.
With a 13% beat rate on recent quarters, earnings predictability has been mixed. The most recent quarter delivered a 21.9% earnings surprise. Analyst estimate revisions are trending downward.
What are SNOW's key risk factors?
With a beta of 1.35, SNOW exhibits an above-market risk profile relative to the broad market. The 95th-percentile CVaR of -30.1% on a one-month horizon should inform position sizing directly: at a 10% portfolio weight, this tail event contributes approximately 3.0% of total portfolio loss in the worst 5% of months. Net margins of -23.8% fall below the Technology sector average of 22%, suggesting margin pressure. Leverage is moderate with debt-to-equity at 143%.
Insiders have been net sellers to the tune of $1043.4M recently. While routine dispositions are common, the magnitude bears watching. Short interest stands at 6.3% of float, a moderate level.
How does SNOW fit in a diversified portfolio?
At typical HENRY portfolio weights — 10–20% of the equity allocation — SNOW carries a beta of 1.35, meaning it amplifies broad market moves proportionally. The appropriate weight is not a function of conviction alone, but of the full covariance structure across all holdings. See the Ledoit-Wolf covariance framework for the methodology behind these calculations.
As a Technology constituent, SNOW's risk profile should be evaluated alongside sector peers when constructing diversified portfolios.
True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure across all holdings — not individual stock metrics. The Portfolio Health Check quantifies this at the portfolio level: it surfaces hidden concentration, marginal CVaR contributions, and the degree to which your overall allocation deviates from an optimal risk-adjusted mandate. The SNOW analysis here is a single node in that larger structure.
Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) carries a Hold quantitative rating from A.L. Capital Advisory, derived from Discounted Cash Flow intrinsic value analysis, five-factor model scoring (Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, Size), and CVaR tail risk measurement. At $239.66, the DCF midpoint margin of safety is +1% (intrinsic value range: $90 bear – $393 bull). Composite factor score: 2.7/5. Strongest factor: Size (4.0/5). Weakest factor: Quality (1.0/5). Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Portfolio Construction Framework →
What is the average analyst target price for SNOW?
Wall Street consensus target for SNOW: $291.28 (+21.5% upside from the current price of $239.66). The analyst target range spans $110.00 (most bearish) to $500.00 (most bullish). Consensus recommendation: Strong Buy. Note that analyst price targets typically reflect a 12-month forward horizon and are derived from a blend of DCF, comparable-company, and sum-of-the-parts analysis. A.L. Capital Advisory’s quantitative Hold rating is produced independently — from DCF intrinsic value, five-factor model scores, and CVaR tail risk — and does not mechanically track Street consensus. When the two diverge, the divergence itself is informative: it can reflect differences in time horizon, valuation methodology, or the degree to which the current price already discounts the consensus case. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Monte Carlo Simulation Framework →
How does SNOW score on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size?
SNOW five-factor scores (A.L. Capital Advisory, 1–5 scale): Value 3.0/5 (neutral) — measures current price versus DCF intrinsic range and trailing earnings multiples; Quality 1.0/5 (weak) — captures profitability metrics including return on equity, net margin (ROE: -54.9%) and net margin (-23.8%); Momentum 3.0/5 (neutral) — reflects recent price trajectory and earnings surprise consistency; Volatility 2.5/5 (neutral) — inverse measure derived from beta, where lower historical volatility earns a higher score; Size 4.0/5 (above average) — market capitalisation rank (mega-cap $1T+ scores 5/5). Composite: 2.7/5. Factor scores above 4.0 signal a tailwind in that dimension; below 2.0 signals a material headwind. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Black-Litterman Model →
What is SNOW's tail risk and CVaR?
The 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) for SNOW on a one-month horizon is -30.1%. CVaR represents the expected average loss in the worst 5% of monthly outcomes — a more conservative tail risk measure than standard VaR, which only marks the loss threshold. Beta of 1.35 indicates above-market volatility with amplified drawdown exposure. For reference, a diversified S&P 500 ETF carries a one-month CVaR of roughly -8% to -12% in normal market conditions; individual equity CVaR is higher due to idiosyncratic risk. At the portfolio level, what matters is the marginal CVaR contribution of each holding — not its standalone figure. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies each position's marginal tail-risk contribution across your entire holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →
What is SNOW's intrinsic value and DCF price target?
A.L. Capital Advisory's DCF model produces an intrinsic value range of $90 (bear case) to $393 (bull case) for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). At $239.66, the midpoint margin of safety is +1% (positive = discount to intrinsic mid; negative = premium). The bear-to-bull spread reflects genuine sensitivity to the two dominant DCF inputs: the terminal growth rate and WACC. Terminal value typically accounts for 60-80% of total intrinsic value in most equity DCF models, which is why a range is more analytically sound than a point estimate. The central analytical question is not what the DCF outputs as a single number but which growth trajectory the current market price already discounts. All DCF analysis follows CFA Institute standards and is conducted by Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →
What would trigger a rating upgrade or downgrade for SNOW?
Upgrade trigger: A price pullback that opens the margin of safety beyond +15% (approximately $77 based on the DCF bear case). Downgrade trigger: a sustained reversal in the Quality and Momentum factor scores for two or more consecutive quarters. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Investment Policy Statement Framework →
Does SNOW consistently beat earnings estimates?
SNOW has beaten consensus EPS estimates in 13% of tracked quarterly periods — indicating inconsistent delivery. The most recent reported quarter beat consensus by 21.9%. Below-average earnings consistency is a primary headwind to the rating and a key watch item in the quantitative model. Earnings surprise magnitude and direction are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality dimensions of the five-factor scoring model. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →
How does SNOW contribute to portfolio risk and diversification?
SNOW carries a beta of 1.35 (high-volatility / growth-sensitive relative to the broad equity market). A beta above 1.0 means the position amplifies market moves in both directions at a typical portfolio weight. True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure — a single stock's beta does not reveal its marginal contribution to portfolio tail loss. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies concentration risk (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index), pairwise correlations, and marginal CVaR contribution across all your holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Ledoit-Wolf Covariance Framework →
What quantitative methodology does A.L. Capital Advisory use to analyse SNOW?
A.L. Capital Advisory analyses Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) using a four-component quantitative framework grounded in CFA Institute standards. (1) DCF Valuation: projects free cash flows under bear and bull assumptions, discounts at WACC to produce an intrinsic value range with margin-of-safety calculation. (2) Five-Factor Scoring: each equity is scored 1–5 on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size. (3) CVaR Tail Risk: 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk from historical simulation of daily returns on a one-month horizon. (4) Earnings Surprise Analysis: quarterly beat rate and magnitude are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality factor scores. The current Hold rating for SNOW is the output of applying this complete framework to current data. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework → · CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →
Stress-Test This View Live
Run SNOW in Asset Lens
Live DCF valuation, Monte Carlo simulation, options flow intelligence, and full factor decomposition — updated in real time. Free, no account required.
This analysis is produced using a systematic quantitative framework applied to market data and does not constitute investment advice. Prose commentary is AI-assisted and generated from structured quantitative inputs. All data and metrics are as of 2026-06-11 and are point-in-time estimates subject to revision without notice. CVaR figures are based on historical simulation and do not guarantee future outcomes. DCF ranges and upgrade/downgrade triggers are forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and may not materialise. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This analysis does not account for individual circumstances, tax position, or investment objectives — consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. This content is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute regulated investment advice under MiFID II or FCA guidelines. This content is not intended for US persons or residents of jurisdictions where its distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. This service is not directed at residents of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, or Poland. The author may hold long or short positions in securities mentioned in this analysis. Nothing on this page represents a solicitation to buy or sell any security. A.L. Capital Advisory is an independent private advisory practice and is not affiliated with Snowflake Inc.
CFA Portfolio Advisory — SNOW
Discuss this analysis, position sizing, or your full portfolio mandate with Anton Ladnyi, CFA.