MongoDB Inc. (MDB) Stock Analysis — Price Target, Reduce Rating & DCF Valuation (2026)

MongoDB — document database leader re-accelerating as AI apps drive NoSQL adoption in agentic architectures

MDB Price Target & Rating

MDB's quantitative grade is Reduce, with elevated downside risk (CVaR -33.4%), and quality metrics (net margin -1%, ROE -1%). MongoDB Inc. (MDB) trades at $335.55 with a valuation grade of Reduce: net margins of -1.1%, a DCF-implied intrinsic range of $225–$415 suggesting a -5% margin of safety, beta 1.49 (moderate risk profile).

VALUEFAIR RANGEPREMIUM BEAR$224.59BULL$415.48 BASE$302 CURRENT$336 MOS vs BASE-10.1% DCF VALUATION RANGE · MDB
  • Valuation: Reduce grade — DCF range $225–$415 implies -5% margin of safety
  • Risk: CVaR -33.4% (95th percentile, 1-month) indicates moderate tail exposure; beta of 1.49 amplifies broad market moves in both directions
  • Strengths: -1% net margin, -1% ROE dominate the factor profile
  • Catalyst: Q2 FY27 earnings; Atlas consumption growth metrics; AI app developer adoption data
  • Bear catalyst: Close below $270 (Atlas deceleration below 20% or competitive share loss to pgvector)
MDB — Quantitative Snapshot May 2026
RatingReduce
Price$335.55
Why ReduceModestly above estimated intrinsic value — risk/reward skewed to the downside at current price; watch for a pullback to the Hold boundary
Main riskElevated tail risk — CVaR -33.4% on a one-month horizon
Tail riskCVaR -33.4% over one month at the 95th percentile
DCF range$225–$415 intrinsic range; margin of safety -5%
Best useCore large-cap Technology holding — not a source of diversified sector exposure
Next watchEarnings surprise deceleration trend — monitor next quarter delivery closely
MDB Quantitative Factor Radar Chart Pentagon radar chart showing MDB factor scores: Value 3.0, Quality 2.0, Momentum 3.0, Volatility 2.5, Size 3.0 — each scored on a 1 to 5 scale. VALUE 3.0 QUALITY 2.0 MOMENTUM 3.0 VOLATILITY 2.5 SIZE 3.0
Value
3.0 / 5
Quality
2.0 / 5
Momentum
3.0 / 5
Volatility
2.5 / 5
Size
3.0 / 5
MDB Key Metrics — MongoDB Inc. 2026
MetricValue
Current Price$335.55
Forward P/E45.8x
P/S Ratio10.4
EV/EBITDA-302.8
Beta1.49
Net Margin-1.1%
ROE-1.0%
Debt/Equity2.0%
CVaR (95%, 1M)-33.4%
Market Cap$27.0B
Analyst View
Anton Ladnyi, CFA · A.L. Capital Advisory Updated 2026-05-30

MongoDB — document database leader re-accelerating as AI apps drive NoSQL adoption in agentic architectures

↑ Bull Case
  • Q1 FY27 revenue $687.6M (+25% beat); adj EPS $1.32 vs $1.18; FY27 guidance raised to $2.94B
  • Stock jumped 22% on earnings — sentiment reset from prolonged growth concern
  • Atlas cloud database revenue +30% YoY — consumption model benefits from AI app proliferation
  • Vector search (for RAG/AI apps) becoming strategic differentiator; embedding in AI stack
  • Enterprise Atlas customer count growing; ARPU expanding with consumption-based billing
↓ Bear Case
  • Still ~60x fwd EPS; requires sustained 20%+ growth to justify multiple
  • PostgreSQL + pgvector provides free vector search for AI apps — competitive threat
  • Atlas consumption model creates revenue volatility when customer workloads fluctuate
  • AWS DocumentDB and Azure Cosmos DB as MongoDB-compatible managed alternatives
  • Enterprise license (EA) growth slower than Atlas; on-prem declining is a drag
Catalyst: Atlas revenue growing 35%+ and vector search becoming 10%+ of Atlas workloads
Stop / exit: Close below $270 (Atlas deceleration below 20% or competitive share loss to pgvector)
The rating on MDB is driven by a factor profile that is genuinely mixed — there is no clean narrative here, which is itself a signal worth taking seriously. The tail risk is the thing. A CVaR of -33.4% is not a number to dismiss — it means in bad months this position can move severely, and that has to be reflected in how much you size it, not just whether you own it at all. The scenario that changes my read is a genuine valuation reset — not a small pullback, but a re-rating that reflects the actual risk profile. Until that happens, the risk/reward is not there.
— Anton Ladnyi, CFA
MDB Earnings History — EPS Surprise Rate 2026
QuarterEPS Est.EPS ActualSurprise
Q2 2026$1.18$1.32+11.5%
Q1 2026$1.47$1.65+12.1%
Q4 2025$0.79$1.32+66.9%
Q3 2025$0.66$1.00+52.4%
$0.00$0.60$1.20$1.80 +52.4%+66.9%+12.1%+11.5% Q3'25Q4'25Q1'26Q2'26 BEAT RATE4/4 ESTIMATEBEATMISS EPS ACTUAL vs ESTIMATE · MDB
MDB Forward EPS Consensus Estimates 2026
QuarterEPS Est.YoY EPSAnalysts
Q3 2026$1.28+28.0%34
Q4 2026$1.57+19.0%34
Q1 2027~$1.67+1.2%35
Q2 2027~$1.77+34.1%38
~ Estimated from annual consensus — not a direct analyst survey
$0.00$0.60$1.20$1.80$2.40 +28%+19%+1%+34% Q3 2026Q4 2026Q1 2027Q2 2027 ESTIMATE TRENDACCELERATING CONSENSUS EPSANALYST RANGEBased on 38 analyst estimates EPS FORWARD ESTIMATES · MDB
MDB Peer Valuation Comparison 2026
TickerP/E (TTM)Fwd P/EBetaCVaR-95Net Margin
MDB45.8x1.49-33.4%-1.1%
MSFT26.8x23.3x1.09-17.0%39.3%
AMZN31.7x27.4x1.47-16.6%12.2%
GOOGL29.0x26.2x1.27-10.8%37.9%
SNOW97.9x1.08-30.1%-23.8%
Hover each scenario for detail · current price $335.55
BEAR$210BASE$390BULL$580 $336 DCF SCENARIO RANGE · MDB
Bear Case
$210
-37.4%
Fwd P/E: 33.4x
12 revenue CAGR · 35 exit multiple
Base Case
$390
+16.2%
Fwd P/E: 62.0x
20 revenue CAGR · 55 exit multiple
Bull Case
$580
+72.9%
Fwd P/E: 92.2x
28 revenue CAGR · 75 exit multiple
Pairwise Correlation Matrix — MDB vs SNOW vs MSFT vs AMZN vs GOOGL 5×5 pairwise correlation matrix showing co-movement between MDB, SNOW, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL over a trailing 12-month window. MDB SNOW MSFT AMZN GOOGL MDB SNOW MSFT AMZN GOOGL 1.00 0.55 0.36 0.17 0.11 0.55 1.00 0.47 0.15 0.07 0.36 0.47 1.00 0.29 0.06 0.17 0.15 0.29 1.00 0.40 0.11 0.07 0.06 0.40 1.00
0 of 10 peer pairs correlated above 0.60 — diversification benefit within this cluster is structurally limited.
Extended Analysis — Buy, Hold or Sell? Risk Factors. Portfolio Fit.

Is MDB a buy, hold, or sell?

MDB carries a valuation grade of Reduce. Our discounted cash flow model produces an intrinsic range of $225–$415 — implying a -5% margin of safety at the current price of $335.55. The width of the DCF range reflects genuine uncertainty in the terminal growth rate assumption: the correct framework is a probability-weighted distribution over scenarios, not a single point estimate. See the DCF valuation framework for full methodology.

With a 12% beat rate on recent quarters, earnings predictability has been mixed. The most recent quarter delivered a 11.5% earnings surprise. Analyst estimate revisions are trending downward.

What are MDB's key risk factors?

With a beta of 1.49, MDB exhibits an above-market risk profile relative to the broad market. The 95th-percentile CVaR of -33.4% on a one-month horizon should inform position sizing directly: at a 10% portfolio weight, this tail event contributes approximately 3.3% of total portfolio loss in the worst 5% of months. Net margins of -1.1% fall below the Technology sector average of 22%, suggesting margin pressure. The balance sheet is conservatively leveraged at 2% debt-to-equity.

A put/call ratio of 0.86 indicates roughly balanced sentiment in the options market. Implied volatility of 75.2% exceeds realized volatility of 67.7% by 8 points, suggesting options are pricing in elevated risk. Insiders have been net sellers to the tune of $142.8M recently. While routine dispositions are common, the magnitude bears watching. Short interest is low at 5.0% of float, suggesting limited bearish conviction.

How does MDB fit in a diversified portfolio?

At typical HENRY portfolio weights — 10–20% of the equity allocation — MDB carries a beta of 1.49, meaning it amplifies broad market moves proportionally. The appropriate weight is not a function of conviction alone, but of the full covariance structure across all holdings. See the Ledoit-Wolf covariance framework for the methodology behind these calculations.

Among closely correlated names, MDB shows the strongest co-movement with SNOW (0.55), MSFT (0.36), AMZN (0.17). Investors seeking diversification should note these correlation dynamics when constructing multi-asset portfolios.

True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure across all holdings — not individual stock metrics. The Portfolio Health Check quantifies this at the portfolio level: it surfaces hidden concentration, marginal CVaR contributions, and the degree to which your overall allocation deviates from an optimal risk-adjusted mandate. The MDB analysis here is a single node in that larger structure.

Is MDB a buy or sell in 2026?

MongoDB Inc. (MDB) carries a Reduce quantitative rating from A.L. Capital Advisory, derived from Discounted Cash Flow intrinsic value analysis, five-factor model scoring (Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, Size), and CVaR tail risk measurement. At $335.55, the DCF midpoint margin of safety is -5% (intrinsic value range: $225 bear – $415 bull). Composite factor score: 2.7/5. Strongest factor: Value (3.0/5). Weakest factor: Quality (2.0/5). Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Portfolio Construction Framework →

What is the average analyst target price for MDB?

Wall Street consensus target for MDB: $362.24 (+8.0% upside from the current price of $335.55). The analyst target range spans $272.64 (most bearish) to $495.00 (most bullish). Consensus recommendation: Buy. Note that analyst price targets typically reflect a 12-month forward horizon and are derived from a blend of DCF, comparable-company, and sum-of-the-parts analysis. A.L. Capital Advisory’s quantitative Reduce rating is produced independently — from DCF intrinsic value, five-factor model scores, and CVaR tail risk — and does not mechanically track Street consensus. When the two diverge, the divergence itself is informative: it can reflect differences in time horizon, valuation methodology, or the degree to which the current price already discounts the consensus case. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Monte Carlo Simulation Framework →

How does MDB score on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size?

MDB five-factor scores (A.L. Capital Advisory, 1–5 scale): Value 3.0/5 (neutral) — measures current price versus DCF intrinsic range and trailing earnings multiples; Quality 2.0/5 (below average) — captures profitability metrics including return on equity, net margin (ROE: -1.0%) and net margin (-1.1%); Momentum 3.0/5 (neutral) — reflects recent price trajectory and earnings surprise consistency; Volatility 2.5/5 (neutral) — inverse measure derived from beta, where lower historical volatility earns a higher score; Size 3.0/5 (neutral) — market capitalisation rank (mega-cap $1T+ scores 5/5). Composite: 2.7/5. Factor scores above 4.0 signal a tailwind in that dimension; below 2.0 signals a material headwind. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Black-Litterman Model →

What is MDB's tail risk and CVaR?

The 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) for MDB on a one-month horizon is -33.4%. CVaR represents the expected average loss in the worst 5% of monthly outcomes — a more conservative tail risk measure than standard VaR, which only marks the loss threshold. Beta of 1.49 indicates above-market volatility with amplified drawdown exposure. For reference, a diversified S&P 500 ETF carries a one-month CVaR of roughly -8% to -12% in normal market conditions; individual equity CVaR is higher due to idiosyncratic risk. At the portfolio level, what matters is the marginal CVaR contribution of each holding — not its standalone figure. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies each position's marginal tail-risk contribution across your entire holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

What is MDB's intrinsic value and DCF price target?

A.L. Capital Advisory's DCF model produces an intrinsic value range of $225 (bear case) to $415 (bull case) for MongoDB Inc. (MDB). At $335.55, the midpoint margin of safety is -5% (positive = discount to intrinsic mid; negative = premium). The bear-to-bull spread reflects genuine sensitivity to the two dominant DCF inputs: the terminal growth rate and WACC. Terminal value typically accounts for 60-80% of total intrinsic value in most equity DCF models, which is why a range is more analytically sound than a point estimate. The central analytical question is not what the DCF outputs as a single number but which growth trajectory the current market price already discounts. All DCF analysis follows CFA Institute standards and is conducted by Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

What would trigger a rating upgrade or downgrade for MDB?

Upgrade trigger: Upgrade to Strong Buy on accelerating earnings momentum, improving factor scores, and a wider margin of safety. Downgrade trigger: Continued earnings misses or deteriorating balance sheet quality reducing the Quality factor score below 2.0/5. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Investment Policy Statement Framework →

Does MDB consistently beat earnings estimates?

MDB has beaten consensus EPS estimates in 12% of tracked quarterly periods — indicating inconsistent delivery. The most recent reported quarter beat consensus by 11.5%. Below-average earnings consistency is a primary headwind to the rating and a key watch item in the quantitative model. Earnings surprise magnitude and direction are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality dimensions of the five-factor scoring model. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

How does MDB contribute to portfolio risk and diversification?

MDB carries a beta of 1.49 (high-volatility / growth-sensitive relative to the broad equity market). A beta above 1.0 means the position amplifies market moves in both directions at a typical portfolio weight. Strongest peer co-movement: SNOW (0.55), MSFT (0.36), AMZN (0.17). Holding MDB alongside these names in the same portfolio increases concentration risk. True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure — a single stock's beta does not reveal its marginal contribution to portfolio tail loss. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies concentration risk (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index), pairwise correlations, and marginal CVaR contribution across all your holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Ledoit-Wolf Covariance Framework →

What quantitative methodology does A.L. Capital Advisory use to analyse MDB?

A.L. Capital Advisory analyses MongoDB Inc. (MDB) using a four-component quantitative framework grounded in CFA Institute standards. (1) DCF Valuation: projects free cash flows under bear and bull assumptions, discounts at WACC to produce an intrinsic value range with margin-of-safety calculation. (2) Five-Factor Scoring: each equity is scored 1–5 on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size. (3) CVaR Tail Risk: 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk from historical simulation of daily returns on a one-month horizon. (4) Earnings Surprise Analysis: quarterly beat rate and magnitude are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality factor scores. The current Reduce rating for MDB is the output of applying this complete framework to current data. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →  ·  CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

Stress-Test This View Live

Run MDB in Asset Lens

Live DCF valuation, Monte Carlo simulation, options flow intelligence, and full factor decomposition — updated in real time. Free, no account required.

Launch Live Analysis →
Anton Ladnyi — Founder & Portfolio Architect, A.L. Capital Advisory, ex-Goldman Sachs, CFA
Anton Ladnyi, CFA
Founder & Portfolio Architect — A.L. Capital Advisory
Ex-Goldman Sachs Equity Research · Ex-J.P. Morgan Wealth Management · CFA Charterholder
Legal Disclaimer & Important Notices

This analysis is produced using a systematic quantitative framework applied to market data and does not constitute investment advice. Prose commentary is AI-assisted and generated from structured quantitative inputs. All data and metrics are as of 2026-05-30 and are point-in-time estimates subject to revision without notice. CVaR figures are based on historical simulation and do not guarantee future outcomes. DCF ranges and upgrade/downgrade triggers are forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and may not materialise. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This analysis does not account for individual circumstances, tax position, or investment objectives — consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. This content is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute regulated investment advice under MiFID II or FCA guidelines. This content is not intended for US persons or residents of jurisdictions where its distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. This service is not directed at residents of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, or Poland. The author may hold long or short positions in securities mentioned in this analysis. Nothing on this page represents a solicitation to buy or sell any security. A.L. Capital Advisory is an independent private advisory practice and is not affiliated with MongoDB Inc.

CFA Portfolio Advisory — MDB Discuss this analysis, position sizing, or your full portfolio mandate with Anton Ladnyi, CFA.