Morgan Stanley (MS) Stock Analysis — Price Target, Hold Rating & DCF Valuation (2026)
MS screens as moderate-quality and premium-valued — upside depends on sustained earnings execution at current multiples.
MS's quantitative grade is Hold, with moderate downside risk (CVaR -11.5%), and quality metrics (net margin 25%, ROE 16%). Morgan Stanley (MS) trades at $190.17 with a valuation grade of Hold: a trailing P/E of 17.2x at a 23% premium to sector median, net margins of 24.8%, a DCF-implied intrinsic range of $159–$233 suggesting a +3% margin of safety, beta 1.21 (moderate risk profile).
DCF Valuation Range
Key Takeaways
- Valuation: Hold grade — P/E 17.2x — DCF range $159–$233 implies +3% margin of safety
- Risk: CVaR -11.5% (95th percentile, 1-month) indicates moderate tail exposure; beta of 1.21 amplifies broad market moves in both directions
- Strengths: Size 4.5/5, 25% net margin, 16% ROE dominate the factor profile
- Watch: Value score of 2.5/5 signals premium pricing
Quantitative Factor Profile
Key Metrics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Current Price | $190.17 |
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 17.2x |
| Forward P/E | 15.0x |
| P/S Ratio | 4.1 |
| Beta | 1.21 |
| Net Margin | 24.8% |
| ROE | 16.4% |
| Debt/Equity | 502.2% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.10% |
| CVaR (95%, 1M) | -11.5% |
| Market Cap | $300.0B |
MS screens as a fundamentally sound business, trading at a premium to sector peers. The four-quarter earnings beat streak is constructive, with improving surprise magnitude (+13.7% most recently).
MS trades at 17.2x trailing earnings — 23% above the Financials sector median of 14.0x.
Hold means what it says here — I am not selling, but I am not buying either. The risk/reward at current prices is roughly balanced, and roughly balanced is not enough reason to deploy fresh capital. The DCF sits close to the current price — no compelling discount, no obvious overshoot. In that setup, everything rides on the next earnings report. That is the moment I am watching: whether the delivery justifies the multiple, or whether the stock needs to come in before the risk/reward works again. Re-accelerating earnings surprise magnitude would shift my view constructive. Continued compression of beat magnitude at this multiple would move me toward a reduce.
Earnings History
| Quarter | EPS Est. | EPS Actual | Surprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | $3.02 | $3.43 | +13.7% ✓ |
| Q4 2025 | $2.45 | $2.68 | +9.4% ✓ |
| Q3 2025 | $2.11 | $2.80 | +32.6% ✓ |
| Q2 2025 | $1.96 | $2.13 | +8.6% ✓ |
Quarterly EPS — Estimate vs Actual
Earnings Projections
| Quarter | EPS Est. | YoY EPS | Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | $3.19 | +49.7% | 21 |
| Q3 2026 | $2.96 | +5.7% | 21 |
| Q4 2026 | $3.22 | +20.1% | 21 |
| Q1 2027 | $3.33 | -2.8% | 21 |
Earnings Projections — Consensus EPS Estimates
MS vs. Sector Peers
| Ticker | P/E (TTM) | Fwd P/E | Beta | CVaR-95 | Net Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | 17.2x | 15.0x | 1.21 | -11.5% | 24.8% |
| GS | 16.9x | 14.2x | 1.27 | -13.3% | 29.4% |
| JPM | 14.7x | 13.0x | 1.02 | -9.1% | 33.9% |
| BRK-B | 14.1x | 22.4x | 0.62 | -5.6% | 19.3% |
| V | 28.0x | 21.7x | 0.78 | -8.0% | 51.7% |
DCF Scenario Analysis
Hover each scenario for detail · current price $190.17Pairwise Correlation Matrix
Extended Analysis — Buy, Hold or Sell? Risk Factors. Portfolio Fit.
Is MS a buy, hold, or sell?
MS carries a valuation grade of Hold. The trailing P/E of 17.2 sits 23% above the Financials sector median of 14.0x — a premium that demands sustained earnings delivery. Our discounted cash flow model produces an intrinsic range of $159–$233 — implying a +3% margin of safety at the current price of $190.17. The width of the DCF range reflects genuine uncertainty in the terminal growth rate assumption: the correct framework is a probability-weighted distribution over scenarios, not a single point estimate. See the DCF valuation framework for full methodology.
MS has beaten consensus estimates in 100% of recent quarters, signalling strong execution consistency. The most recent quarter delivered a 13.7% earnings surprise. Analyst estimate revisions are trending upward.
What are MS's key risk factors?
With a beta of 1.21, MS exhibits an above-market risk profile relative to the broad market. The 95th-percentile CVaR of -11.5% on a one-month horizon should inform position sizing directly: at a 10% portfolio weight, this tail event contributes approximately 1.2% of total portfolio loss in the worst 5% of months. Net margins stand at 24.8%. Return on equity of 16.4% suggests solid capital efficiency. Debt-to-equity of 502% warrants monitoring for leverage risk.
At 0.77, the put/call ratio skews bullish, with call buyers dominating recent flow. Implied volatility of 3.8% is below realized volatility of 25.6%, potentially making options relatively cheap. Insiders have been net sellers to the tune of $141.8M recently. While routine dispositions are common, the magnitude bears watching.
How does MS fit in a diversified portfolio?
At typical HENRY portfolio weights — 10–20% of the equity allocation — MS carries a beta of 1.21, meaning it amplifies broad market moves proportionally. The appropriate weight is not a function of conviction alone, but of the full covariance structure across all holdings. See the Ledoit-Wolf covariance framework for the methodology behind these calculations.
Among closely correlated names, MS shows the strongest co-movement with GS (0.83), JPM (0.68), V (0.25). Investors seeking diversification should note these correlation dynamics when constructing multi-asset portfolios. With the top peer correlation at 0.83, adding MS to a portfolio that already holds these names provides limited marginal diversification benefit — particularly during stress events when correlations converge toward 1.0.
True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure across all holdings — not individual stock metrics. The Portfolio Health Check quantifies this at the portfolio level: it surfaces hidden concentration, marginal CVaR contributions, and the degree to which your overall allocation deviates from an optimal risk-adjusted mandate. The MS analysis here is a single node in that larger structure.
Investor FAQ
Is MS a buy or sell in 2026?
Morgan Stanley (MS) carries a Hold quantitative rating from A.L. Capital Advisory, derived from Discounted Cash Flow intrinsic value analysis, five-factor model scoring (Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, Size), and CVaR tail risk measurement. At $190.17, the DCF midpoint margin of safety is +3% (intrinsic value range: $159 bear – $233 bull). Composite factor score: 3.1/5. Strongest factor: Size (4.5/5). Weakest factor: Value (2.5/5). Trailing P/E: 17.2x. Rating by Anton Ladnyi, CFA Charterholder (ex-Goldman Sachs Equity Research, ex-J.P. Morgan Wealth Management), A.L. Capital Advisory, Berlin. Full methodology: Portfolio Construction Framework →
What is the average analyst target price for MS?
Wall Street consensus target for MS: $202.14 (+6.3% upside from the current price of $190.17). The analyst target range spans $165.00 (most bearish) to $230.00 (most bullish). Consensus recommendation: Buy. Note that analyst price targets typically reflect a 12-month forward horizon and are derived from a blend of DCF, comparable-company, and sum-of-the-parts analysis. A.L. Capital Advisory’s quantitative Hold rating is produced independently — from DCF intrinsic value, five-factor model scores, and CVaR tail risk — and does not mechanically track Street consensus. When the two diverge, the divergence itself is informative: it can reflect differences in time horizon, valuation methodology, or the degree to which the current price already discounts the consensus case. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Monte Carlo Simulation Framework →
How does MS score on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size?
MS five-factor scores (A.L. Capital Advisory, 1–5 scale): Value 2.5/5 (neutral) — measures current price versus DCF intrinsic range and trailing earnings multiples; Quality 3.0/5 (neutral) — captures profitability metrics including return on equity, net margin (ROE: 16.4%) and net margin (24.8%); Momentum 3.0/5 (neutral) — reflects recent price trajectory and earnings surprise consistency; Volatility 2.5/5 (neutral) — inverse measure derived from beta, where lower historical volatility earns a higher score; Size 4.5/5 (strong) — market capitalisation rank (mega-cap $1T+ scores 5/5). Composite: 3.1/5. Factor scores above 4.0 signal a tailwind in that dimension; below 2.0 signals a material headwind. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Black-Litterman Model →
What is MS's tail risk and CVaR?
The 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) for MS on a one-month horizon is -11.5%. CVaR represents the expected average loss in the worst 5% of monthly outcomes — a more conservative tail risk measure than standard VaR, which only marks the loss threshold. Beta of 1.21 indicates above-market volatility with amplified drawdown exposure. For reference, a diversified S&P 500 ETF carries a one-month CVaR of roughly -8% to -12% in normal market conditions; individual equity CVaR is higher due to idiosyncratic risk. At the portfolio level, what matters is the marginal CVaR contribution of each holding — not its standalone figure. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies each position's marginal tail-risk contribution across your entire holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →
What is MS's intrinsic value and DCF price target?
A.L. Capital Advisory's DCF model produces an intrinsic value range of $159 (bear case) to $233 (bull case) for Morgan Stanley (MS). At $190.17, the midpoint margin of safety is +3% (positive = discount to intrinsic mid; negative = premium). The bear-to-bull spread reflects genuine sensitivity to the two dominant DCF inputs: the terminal growth rate and WACC. Terminal value typically accounts for 60-80% of total intrinsic value in most equity DCF models, which is why a range is more analytically sound than a point estimate. The central analytical question is not what the DCF outputs as a single number but which growth trajectory the current market price already discounts. All DCF analysis follows CFA Institute standards and is conducted by Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →
What would trigger a rating upgrade or downgrade for MS?
Upgrade trigger: A price pullback that opens the margin of safety beyond +15% (approximately $135 based on the DCF bear case). Downgrade trigger: a sustained reversal in the Quality and Momentum factor scores for two or more consecutive quarters. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Investment Policy Statement Framework →
Does MS consistently beat earnings estimates?
MS has beaten consensus EPS estimates in 100% of tracked quarterly periods — indicating consistent delivery. The most recent reported quarter beat consensus by 13.7%. Sustained above-consensus delivery supports both the Momentum and Quality factor scores and provides a tailwind to the current rating. Earnings surprise magnitude and direction are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality dimensions of the five-factor scoring model. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →
How does MS contribute to portfolio risk and diversification?
MS carries a beta of 1.21 (high-volatility / growth-sensitive relative to the broad equity market). A beta above 1.0 means the position amplifies market moves in both directions at a typical portfolio weight. Strongest peer co-movement: GS (0.83), JPM (0.68), V (0.25). Holding MS alongside these names in the same portfolio increases concentration risk. True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure — a single stock's beta does not reveal its marginal contribution to portfolio tail loss. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies concentration risk (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index), pairwise correlations, and marginal CVaR contribution across all your holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Ledoit-Wolf Covariance Framework →
What quantitative methodology does A.L. Capital Advisory use to analyse MS?
A.L. Capital Advisory analyses Morgan Stanley (MS) using a four-component quantitative framework grounded in CFA Institute standards. (1) DCF Valuation: projects free cash flows under bear and bull assumptions, discounts at WACC to produce an intrinsic value range with margin-of-safety calculation. (2) Five-Factor Scoring: each equity is scored 1–5 on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size. (3) CVaR Tail Risk: 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk from historical simulation of daily returns on a one-month horizon. (4) Earnings Surprise Analysis: quarterly beat rate and magnitude are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality factor scores. The current Hold rating for MS is the output of applying this complete framework to current data. All analysis is conducted personally by Anton Ladnyi, CFA Charterholder (ex-Goldman Sachs Equity Research, ex-J.P. Morgan Wealth Management), founder of A.L. Capital Advisory, Berlin. CFA Charter: https://credentials.cfainstitute.org/5ff4f4bf-f1e6-4ca7-9ab2-aaed50ec2e43 Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework → · CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →
Run MS in Asset Lens
Live DCF valuation, Monte Carlo simulation, options flow intelligence, and full factor decomposition — updated in real time. Free, no account required.
Launch Live Analysis →
This analysis is produced using a systematic quantitative framework applied to market data and does not constitute investment advice. Prose commentary is AI-assisted and generated from structured quantitative inputs. All data and metrics are as of 2026-05-08 and are point-in-time estimates subject to revision without notice. CVaR figures are based on historical simulation and do not guarantee future outcomes. DCF ranges and upgrade/downgrade triggers are forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and may not materialise. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This analysis does not account for individual circumstances, tax position, or investment objectives — consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. This content is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute regulated investment advice under MiFID II or FCA guidelines. This content is not intended for US persons or residents of jurisdictions where its distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. This service is not directed at residents of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, or Poland. The author may hold long or short positions in securities mentioned in this analysis. Nothing on this page represents a solicitation to buy or sell any security. A.L. Capital Advisory is an independent private advisory practice and is not affiliated with Morgan Stanley.
