We use cookies for behaviour analytics. Learn more
Financials · Equity Analysis
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) Stock Analysis — Price Target, Hold Rating & DCF Valuation (2026)
By Anton Ladnyi, CFA · ex-Goldman Sachs · ex-J.P. MorganPublished Updated
GS — SpaceX $75B IPO PRICING JUNE 11 (lead-left, trading June 12, $1.75-2T valuation); co-lead OpenAI IPO Q4 2026; GS economists: no Fed rate cuts in 2026; Databricks and other mega-mandates
GS Price Target & Rating
GS's grade is Hold, with moderate downside risk (CVaR -13.3%), and quality metrics (net margin 29%, ROE 15%). Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) trades at $1,032.01 with a valuation grade of Hold: a trailing P/E of 18.3x at a 31% premium to sector median, net margins of 29.4%, a DCF-implied intrinsic range of $716–$1,076 suggesting a -13% margin of safety, beta 1.29 (moderate risk profile).
DCF Valuation Range
Key Takeaways
Valuation: Hold grade — P/E 18.3x — DCF range $716–$1,076 implies -13% margin of safety
Risk: CVaR -13.3% (95th percentile, 1-month) indicates moderate tail exposure; beta of 1.29 amplifies broad market moves in both directions
Strengths: Size 4.5/5, 29% net margin, 15% ROE dominate the factor profile
Catalyst: SpaceX trading June 12 (fee crystallization complete); OpenAI public S-1 filing August-September 2026; Q2 earnings — IPO fee recognition and FICC trading update
Bear catalyst: SpaceX IPO pulled or priced below $135; OpenAI IPO delayed to 2027; FICC revenue decelerates below $6B in Q2
GS — Quantitative SnapshotJune 2026
RatingHold
Price$1,032.01
Why HoldHigh-quality business at a fully-priced valuation — limited margin for error on earnings
Main riskValue score 2.0/5 signals premium pricing relative to peers
Tail riskCVaR -13.3% over one month at the 95th percentile
DCF range$716–$1,076 intrinsic range; margin of safety -13%
Best useCore large-cap Financials holding — not a source of diversified sector exposure
Next watchEarnings surprise deceleration trend — monitor next quarter delivery closely
Quantitative Factor Profile
Value
2.0 / 5
Quality
3.0 / 5
Momentum
3.0 / 5
Volatility
2.5 / 5
Size
4.5 / 5
Key Metrics
GS Key Metrics — Goldman Sachs Group Inc. 2026
Metric
Value
Current Price
$1,032.01
P/E Ratio (TTM)
18.3x
Forward P/E
15.3x
PEG Ratio
0.63x
P/S Ratio
4.8
Beta
1.29
Net Margin
29.4%
ROE
14.5%
Debt/Equity
678.6%
Dividend Yield
1.80%
CVaR (95%, 1M)
-13.3%
Market Cap
$295.4B
Analyst View
Anton Ladnyi, CFA · A.L. Capital AdvisoryUpdated 2026-06-11
Rating Rationale
GS — SpaceX $75B IPO PRICING JUNE 11 (lead-left, trading June 12, $1.75-2T valuation); co-lead OpenAI IPO Q4 2026; GS economists: no Fed rate cuts in 2026; Databricks and other mega-mandates
Investment Thesis
↑ Bull Case
SpaceX $75B IPO pricing June 11, trading June 12 — largest IPO in history, GS lead-left; fee crystallization imminent; GS projects SpaceX revenue $474B by 2030 (AI = $322B)
OpenAI confidential S-1 filed with GS and MS as co-leads, Q4 2026 IPO target — second multi-billion fee event in same fiscal year
GS economists revised to no Fed rate cuts in 2026 (June 7) — sustained higher rates support FICC trading revenue, NII from lending book
Tokenized real estate fund launched June 3 — asset management platform expansion into digital assets attracting institutional allocators
GS Conviction List additions and new research coverage expanding influence in current market cycle
↓ Bear Case
Stock trading near consensus average PT post-SpaceX mandate announcement — limited near-term upside unless OpenAI IPO materializes
No 2026 rate cuts (GS economist view) is modestly negative for IB refi pipeline — rising rates could slow M&A activity
SpaceX retail allocation (30% to Robinhood/Fidelity/Schwab) reduces GS distribution economics vs traditional institutional-only IPOs
Tokenized fund and alternative products require regulatory approval — growth uncertain in evolving digital asset regulatory landscape
What Changes the Rating
↑Catalyst:SpaceX IPO trades above $135 issue price validating mandate quality; OpenAI S-1 public filing confirms Q4 IPO proceeds; second wave of tech IPOs (Databricks, Stripe) opens
↓Stop / exit:SpaceX IPO pulled or priced below $135; OpenAI IPO delayed to 2027; FICC revenue decelerates below $6B in Q2
Anton’s personal note
Hold means what it says here — I am not selling, but I am not buying either. The risk/reward at current prices is roughly balanced, and roughly balanced is not enough reason to deploy fresh capital. What I watch on this name is earnings consistency — specifically whether delivery against consensus is stable or deteriorating. That is usually where the rating gets confirmed or challenged before the price reflects it. Re-accelerating earnings surprise magnitude would shift my view constructive. Continued compression of beat magnitude at this multiple would move me toward a reduce.
— Anton Ladnyi, CFA
Earnings History
GS Earnings History — EPS Surprise Rate 2026
Quarter
EPS Est.
EPS Actual
Surprise
Q1 2026
$16.39
$17.55
+7.1% ✓
Q4 2025
$11.65
$14.01
+20.2% ✓
Q3 2025
$11.09
$12.25
+10.5% ✓
Q2 2025
$9.66
$10.91
+12.9% ✓
Quarterly EPS — Estimate vs Actual
Earnings Projections
GS Forward EPS Consensus Estimates 2026
Quarter
EPS Est.
YoY EPS
Analysts
Q2 2026
$13.72
+25.8%
19
Q3 2026
$13.80
+12.7%
18
Q4 2026
~$14.29
+2.0%
23
Q1 2027
~$16.35
-6.8%
22
~ Estimated from annual consensus — not a direct analyst survey
GS — P/E 18.3x · Beta 1.29 • Quantitative grade: Reduce • CVaR from one-year daily history · historical simulation
DCF Scenario Analysis
Hover each scenario for detail · current price $1,032.01
▼
Bear Case
$620
-39.9%
Fwd P/E: 10.7x
5% revenue CAGR · 10 exit multiple
◆
Base Case
$1,050
+1.7%
Fwd P/E: 18.1x
12% revenue CAGR · 13 exit multiple
▲
Bull Case
$1,450
+40.5%
Fwd P/E: 24.9x
20% revenue CAGR · 16 exit multiple
Pairwise Correlation Matrix
9 of 10 peer pairs correlated above 0.60 — diversification benefit within this cluster is structurally limited.
Extended Analysis — Buy, Hold or Sell? Risk Factors. Portfolio Fit.
Is GS a buy, hold, or sell?
GS carries a valuation grade of Hold. The trailing P/E of 18.3 sits 31% above the Financials sector median of 14.0x — a premium that demands sustained earnings delivery. Our discounted cash flow model produces an intrinsic range of $716–$1,076 — implying a -13% margin of safety at the current price of $1,032.01. The width of the DCF range reflects genuine uncertainty in the terminal growth rate assumption: the correct framework is a probability-weighted distribution over scenarios, not a single point estimate. See the DCF valuation framework for full methodology.
With a 12% beat rate on recent quarters, earnings predictability has been mixed. The most recent quarter delivered a 7.1% earnings surprise. Analyst estimate revisions are trending upward.
What are GS's key risk factors?
With a beta of 1.29, GS exhibits an above-market risk profile relative to the broad market. The 95th-percentile CVaR of -13.3% on a one-month horizon should inform position sizing directly: at a 10% portfolio weight, this tail event contributes approximately 1.3% of total portfolio loss in the worst 5% of months. Net margins stand at 29.4%. Debt-to-equity of 679% warrants monitoring for leverage risk.
Insiders have been net sellers to the tune of $239.8M recently. While routine dispositions are common, the magnitude bears watching. Short interest is low at 2.6% of float, suggesting limited bearish conviction.
How does GS fit in a diversified portfolio?
At typical HENRY portfolio weights — 10–20% of the equity allocation — GS carries a beta of 1.29, meaning it amplifies broad market moves proportionally. The appropriate weight is not a function of conviction alone, but of the full covariance structure across all holdings. See the Ledoit-Wolf covariance framework for the methodology behind these calculations.
Among closely correlated names, GS shows the strongest co-movement with MS (0.83), C (0.73), JPM (0.66). Investors seeking diversification should note these correlation dynamics when constructing multi-asset portfolios. With the top peer correlation at 0.83, adding GS to a portfolio that already holds these names provides limited marginal diversification benefit — particularly during stress events when correlations converge toward 1.0.
True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure across all holdings — not individual stock metrics. The Portfolio Health Check quantifies this at the portfolio level: it surfaces hidden concentration, marginal CVaR contributions, and the degree to which your overall allocation deviates from an optimal risk-adjusted mandate. The GS analysis here is a single node in that larger structure.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) carries a Hold quantitative rating from A.L. Capital Advisory, derived from Discounted Cash Flow intrinsic value analysis, five-factor model scoring (Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, Size), and CVaR tail risk measurement. At $1,032.01, the DCF midpoint margin of safety is -13% (intrinsic value range: $716 bear – $1,076 bull). Composite factor score: 3.0/5. Strongest factor: Size (4.5/5). Weakest factor: Value (2.0/5). Trailing P/E: 18.3x. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Portfolio Construction Framework →
What is the average analyst target price for GS?
Wall Street consensus target for GS: $947.60 (-8.2% downside from the current price of $1,032.01). The analyst target range spans $730.00 (most bearish) to $1,050.00 (most bullish). Consensus recommendation: Hold. Note that analyst price targets typically reflect a 12-month forward horizon and are derived from a blend of DCF, comparable-company, and sum-of-the-parts analysis. A.L. Capital Advisory’s quantitative Hold rating is produced independently — from DCF intrinsic value, five-factor model scores, and CVaR tail risk — and does not mechanically track Street consensus. When the two diverge, the divergence itself is informative: it can reflect differences in time horizon, valuation methodology, or the degree to which the current price already discounts the consensus case. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Monte Carlo Simulation Framework →
How does GS score on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size?
GS five-factor scores (A.L. Capital Advisory, 1–5 scale): Value 2.0/5 (below average) — measures current price versus DCF intrinsic range and trailing earnings multiples; Quality 3.0/5 (neutral) — captures profitability metrics including return on equity, net margin (ROE: 14.5%) and net margin (29.4%); Momentum 3.0/5 (neutral) — reflects recent price trajectory and earnings surprise consistency; Volatility 2.5/5 (neutral) — inverse measure derived from beta, where lower historical volatility earns a higher score; Size 4.5/5 (strong) — market capitalisation rank (mega-cap $1T+ scores 5/5). Composite: 3.0/5. Factor scores above 4.0 signal a tailwind in that dimension; below 2.0 signals a material headwind. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Black-Litterman Model →
What is GS's tail risk and CVaR?
The 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) for GS on a one-month horizon is -13.3%. CVaR represents the expected average loss in the worst 5% of monthly outcomes — a more conservative tail risk measure than standard VaR, which only marks the loss threshold. Beta of 1.29 indicates above-market volatility with amplified drawdown exposure. For reference, a diversified S&P 500 ETF carries a one-month CVaR of roughly -8% to -12% in normal market conditions; individual equity CVaR is higher due to idiosyncratic risk. At the portfolio level, what matters is the marginal CVaR contribution of each holding — not its standalone figure. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies each position's marginal tail-risk contribution across your entire holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →
What is GS's intrinsic value and DCF price target?
A.L. Capital Advisory's DCF model produces an intrinsic value range of $716 (bear case) to $1,076 (bull case) for Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS). At $1,032.01, the midpoint margin of safety is -13% (positive = discount to intrinsic mid; negative = premium). The bear-to-bull spread reflects genuine sensitivity to the two dominant DCF inputs: the terminal growth rate and WACC. Terminal value typically accounts for 60-80% of total intrinsic value in most equity DCF models, which is why a range is more analytically sound than a point estimate. The central analytical question is not what the DCF outputs as a single number but which growth trajectory the current market price already discounts. All DCF analysis follows CFA Institute standards and is conducted by Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →
What would trigger a rating upgrade or downgrade for GS?
Upgrade trigger: A price pullback that opens the margin of safety beyond +15% (approximately $609 based on the DCF bear case). Downgrade trigger: a sustained reversal in the Quality and Momentum factor scores for two or more consecutive quarters. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Investment Policy Statement Framework →
Does GS consistently beat earnings estimates?
GS has beaten consensus EPS estimates in 12% of tracked quarterly periods — indicating inconsistent delivery. The most recent reported quarter beat consensus by 7.1%. Below-average earnings consistency is a primary headwind to the rating and a key watch item in the quantitative model. Earnings surprise magnitude and direction are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality dimensions of the five-factor scoring model. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →
How does GS contribute to portfolio risk and diversification?
GS carries a beta of 1.29 (high-volatility / growth-sensitive relative to the broad equity market). A beta above 1.0 means the position amplifies market moves in both directions at a typical portfolio weight. Strongest peer co-movement: MS (0.83), C (0.73), JPM (0.66). Holding GS alongside these names in the same portfolio increases concentration risk. True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure — a single stock's beta does not reveal its marginal contribution to portfolio tail loss. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies concentration risk (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index), pairwise correlations, and marginal CVaR contribution across all your holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Ledoit-Wolf Covariance Framework →
What quantitative methodology does A.L. Capital Advisory use to analyse GS?
A.L. Capital Advisory analyses Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) using a four-component quantitative framework grounded in CFA Institute standards. (1) DCF Valuation: projects free cash flows under bear and bull assumptions, discounts at WACC to produce an intrinsic value range with margin-of-safety calculation. (2) Five-Factor Scoring: each equity is scored 1–5 on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size. (3) CVaR Tail Risk: 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk from historical simulation of daily returns on a one-month horizon. (4) Earnings Surprise Analysis: quarterly beat rate and magnitude are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality factor scores. The current Hold rating for GS is the output of applying this complete framework to current data. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework → · CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →
Stress-Test This View Live
Run GS in Asset Lens
Live DCF valuation, Monte Carlo simulation, options flow intelligence, and full factor decomposition — updated in real time. Free, no account required.
This analysis is produced using a systematic quantitative framework applied to market data and does not constitute investment advice. Prose commentary is AI-assisted and generated from structured quantitative inputs. All data and metrics are as of 2026-06-11 and are point-in-time estimates subject to revision without notice. CVaR figures are based on historical simulation and do not guarantee future outcomes. DCF ranges and upgrade/downgrade triggers are forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and may not materialise. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This analysis does not account for individual circumstances, tax position, or investment objectives — consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. This content is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute regulated investment advice under MiFID II or FCA guidelines. This content is not intended for US persons or residents of jurisdictions where its distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. This service is not directed at residents of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, or Poland. The author may hold long or short positions in securities mentioned in this analysis. Nothing on this page represents a solicitation to buy or sell any security. A.L. Capital Advisory is an independent private advisory practice and is not affiliated with Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
CFA Portfolio Advisory — GS
Discuss this analysis, position sizing, or your full portfolio mandate with Anton Ladnyi, CFA.