Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) Stock Analysis — Price Target, Buy Rating & DCF Valuation (2026)

LLY — Eli Lilly at ~$978 on ~26x forward P/E raised FY2026 guidance to $82-85B revenue and $35.50-37.00 EPS after Q1 2026 +56% revenue to $19.8B (Mounjaro+Zepbound $12.8B combined), EPS $8.55 beating $6.97 by 23%; Foundayo (first oral GLP-1 without food/water restriction) FDA approved but early Rx data lagged oral Wegovy.

LLY Price Target & Rating

LLY's grade is Buy, with moderate downside risk (CVaR -17.8%), and quality metrics (net margin 35%, ROE 107%). Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) trades at $1,136.37 with a valuation grade of Buy: a trailing P/E of 40.3x at a 83% premium to sector median, net margins of 35.0%, a DCF-implied intrinsic range of $865–$1,579 suggesting a +8% margin of safety, beta 0.52 (defensive risk profile).

VALUEFAIR RANGEPREMIUM BEAR$864.73BULL$1,579.20 BASE$1,235 CURRENT$1,136 MOS vs BASE+8.7% DCF VALUATION RANGE · LLY
  • Valuation: Buy grade — P/E 40.3x — DCF range $865–$1,579 implies +8% margin of safety
  • Risk: CVaR -17.8% (95th percentile, 1-month) indicates moderate tail exposure; beta of 0.52 amplifies broad market moves in both directions
  • Strengths: Quality 5.0/5, Size 5.0/5, 35% net margin, 107% ROE dominate the factor profile
  • Catalyst: Retatrutide obesity Phase 3 final data (expected H2 2026); Foundayo monthly Rx ramp data; Zepbound sleep apnea label expansion launch
  • Bear catalyst: Foundayo fails to capture >15% oral GLP-1 market share within 6 months of launch; retatrutide safety signal in Phase 3; GLP-1 Medicare price set below $50/month negotiated ceiling
LLY — Quantitative Snapshot June 2026
RatingBuy
Price$1,136.37
Why BuyFactor profile supports upside — valuation premium reflects growth expectations
Main riskPremium multiple (40.3x P/E) demands consistent delivery
Tail riskCVaR -17.8% over one month at the 95th percentile
DCF range$865–$1,579 intrinsic range; margin of safety +8%
Best useCore mega-cap Healthcare holding — not a source of diversified sector exposure
Next watchEarnings delivery consistency and margin trajectory
LLY Quantitative Factor Radar Chart Pentagon radar chart showing LLY factor scores: Value 2.0, Quality 5.0, Momentum 3.0, Volatility 4.5, Size 5.0 — each scored on a 1 to 5 scale. VALUE 2.0 QUALITY 5.0 MOMENTUM 3.0 VOLATILITY 4.5 SIZE 5.0
Value
2.0 / 5
Quality
5.0 / 5
Momentum
3.0 / 5
Volatility
4.5 / 5
Size
5.0 / 5
LLY Key Metrics — Eli Lilly and Company 2026
MetricValue
Current Price$1,136.37
P/E Ratio (TTM)40.3x
Forward P/E25.5x
PEG Ratio15.03x
P/S Ratio14.0
EV/EBITDA29.0
Beta0.52
Net Margin35.0%
ROE107.5%
Debt/Equity139.0%
Dividend Yield0.61%
CVaR (95%, 1M)-17.8%
Market Cap$1.01T
Analyst View
Anton Ladnyi, CFA · A.L. Capital Advisory Updated 2026-06-11

LLY — Eli Lilly at ~$978 on ~26x forward P/E raised FY2026 guidance to $82-85B revenue and $35.50-37.00 EPS after Q1 2026 +56% revenue to $19.8B (Mounjaro+Zepbound $12.8B combined), EPS $8.55 beating $6.97 by 23%; Foundayo (first oral GLP-1 without food/water restriction) FDA approved but early Rx data lagged oral Wegovy.

↑ Bull Case
  • Mounjaro + Zepbound combined $12.8B in Q1 alone (+56% YoY) — one of the fastest revenue ramps in pharmaceutical history; CMS $50/month GLP-1 bridge for seniors expands access
  • Foundayo (orforglipron): first oral GLP-1 any time of day, no food/water restrictions; ADA June 2026 ACHIEVE-3 head-to-head trial showed Foundayo beat oral semaglutide on all primary and key secondary endpoints in T2D — clinical superiority now established; women's health data across all menopause stages further expands TAM
  • Retatrutide (triple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon agonist): Phase 3 positive in T2D; Phase 3 obesity data exceeding tirzepatide weight loss — regulatory filing expected H2 2026
  • Tirzepatide expansion: sleep apnea (Phase 3 positive), heart failure, MASH, psoriatic arthritis — TAM expanding well beyond obesity/diabetes
  • Four acquisitions: Orna Therapeutics, Centessa, Kelonia (in-vivo CAR-T), Ajax Therapeutics — early-stage diversification preserving pipeline depth
  • FY2026 guidance raised $2B at each end to $82-85B — management raising bar mid-year; 82.6% gross margins reflect exceptional pricing power
↓ Bear Case
  • Foundayo week-one Rx data: ~3,707 Rxs vs. oral Wegovy's comparable ~18,400 — if ramp is structurally slower, raises questions about oral GLP-1 thesis strength
  • IRA drug pricing headwind: low-to-mid teens % price compression embedded in FY2026 guidance; Medicare price negotiation risk escalating
  • Compounded GLP-1 legal risk: FDA action on 503B compounding lists is litigated; if reversed, compounders re-enter market and compete on price
  • Stock -11% YTD despite 56% revenue growth — market recalibrating expectations; at 26x forward, priced for sustained perfection
  • Retatrutide regulatory timeline: Phase 3 success doesn't guarantee fast approval given complexity of triple agonist safety profile
Catalyst: Foundayo Rx ramp accelerates above 25,000/week in U.S.; retatrutide shows superiority vs tirzepatide in obesity pivotal study
Stop / exit: Foundayo fails to capture >15% oral GLP-1 market share within 6 months of launch; retatrutide safety signal in Phase 3; GLP-1 Medicare price set below $50/month negotiated ceiling
LLY earns a Buy from the model, and I agree on direction. But premium multiples concentrate the risk in execution — there is not much room for a soft quarter at 40x. What I watch on this name is earnings consistency — specifically whether delivery against consensus is stable or deteriorating. That is usually where the rating gets confirmed or challenged before the price reflects it. The setup that would make me more positive is a quarter that confirms the operating leverage story. The setup that would make me cautious is any signal that consensus estimates are getting ahead of fundamentals.
— Anton Ladnyi, CFA
LLY Earnings History — EPS Surprise Rate 2026
QuarterEPS Est.EPS ActualSurprise
Q1 2026$6.79$8.55+25.9%
Q4 2025$6.91$7.54+9.1%
Q3 2025$5.89$7.02+19.1%
Q2 2025$5.59$6.31+12.9%
$0.00$3.00$6.00$9.00$12.00 +12.9%+19.1%+9.1%+25.9% Q2'25Q3'25Q4'25Q1'26 BEAT RATE4/4 ESTIMATEBEATMISS EPS ACTUAL vs ESTIMATE · LLY
LLY Forward EPS Consensus Estimates 2026
QuarterEPS Est.YoY EPSAnalysts
Q2 2026$8.81+39.6%20
Q3 2026$9.40+33.9%20
Q4 2026~$9.45+25.3%28
Q1 2027~$11.12+30.1%28
~ Estimated from annual consensus — not a direct analyst survey
$0.00$4.00$8.00$12.00$16.00 +40%+34%+25%+30% Q2 2026Q3 2026Q4 2026Q1 2027 ESTIMATE TRENDACCELERATING CONSENSUS EPSANALYST RANGEBased on 28 analyst estimates EPS FORWARD ESTIMATES · LLY
LLY Peer Valuation Comparison 2026
TickerP/E (TTM)Fwd P/EBetaCVaR-95Net Margin
LLY40.3x25.5x0.52-17.8%35.0%
ABBV109.7x13.8x0.31-10.3%5.8%
PFE19.5x9.0x0.29-8.0%11.8%
JNJ27.6x18.8x0.26-7.0%21.8%
UNH30.7x19.5x0.65-24.0%2.7%
Hover each scenario for detail · current price $1,136.37
BEAR$700BASE$1,200BULL$1,650 $1,136 DCF SCENARIO RANGE · LLY
Bear Case
$700
-38.4%
Fwd P/E: 18.1x
20.0 revenue CAGR · 20.0 exit multiple
Base Case
$1,200
+5.6%
Fwd P/E: 30.9x
35.0 revenue CAGR · 28.0 exit multiple
Bull Case
$1,650
+45.2%
Fwd P/E: 42.5x
50.0 revenue CAGR · 36.0 exit multiple
Pairwise Correlation Matrix — LLY vs PFE vs JNJ vs ABBV vs UNH 5×5 pairwise correlation matrix showing co-movement between LLY, PFE, JNJ, ABBV, UNH over a trailing 12-month window. LLY PFE JNJ ABBV UNH LLY PFE JNJ ABBV UNH 1.00 0.32 0.30 0.29 0.15 0.32 1.00 0.31 0.42 0.12 0.30 0.31 1.00 0.42 0.05 0.29 0.42 0.42 1.00 0.09 0.15 0.12 0.05 0.09 1.00
0 of 10 peer pairs correlated above 0.60 — diversification benefit within this cluster is structurally limited.
Extended Analysis — Buy, Hold or Sell? Risk Factors. Portfolio Fit.

Is LLY a buy, hold, or sell?

LLY carries a valuation grade of Buy. The trailing P/E of 40.3 sits 83% above the Healthcare sector median of 22.0x — a premium that demands sustained earnings delivery. Our discounted cash flow model produces an intrinsic range of $865–$1,579 — implying a +8% margin of safety at the current price of $1,136.37. The width of the DCF range reflects genuine uncertainty in the terminal growth rate assumption: the correct framework is a probability-weighted distribution over scenarios, not a single point estimate. See the DCF valuation framework for full methodology.

With a 12% beat rate on recent quarters, earnings predictability has been mixed. The most recent quarter delivered a 25.9% earnings surprise. Analyst estimate revisions are trending upward.

What are LLY's key risk factors?

With a beta of 0.52, LLY exhibits a defensive risk profile relative to the broad market. The 95th-percentile CVaR of -17.8% on a one-month horizon should inform position sizing directly: at a 10% portfolio weight, this tail event contributes approximately 1.8% of total portfolio loss in the worst 5% of months. Net margins of 35.0% are significantly above the Healthcare sector average of 18%, reflecting durable pricing power. Return on equity of 107.5% indicates highly efficient capital allocation. Leverage is moderate with debt-to-equity at 139%.

At 0.00, the put/call ratio skews bullish, with call buyers dominating recent flow. Implied volatility of 2.1% is below realized volatility of 31.1%, potentially making options relatively cheap. Insiders have been net sellers to the tune of $3748.2M recently. While routine dispositions are common, the magnitude bears watching. Short interest is low at 1.1% of float, suggesting limited bearish conviction.

How does LLY fit in a diversified portfolio?

At typical HENRY portfolio weights — 10–20% of the equity allocation — LLY carries a beta of 0.52, meaning it amplifies broad market moves proportionally. The appropriate weight is not a function of conviction alone, but of the full covariance structure across all buyings. See the Ledoit-Wolf covariance framework for the methodology behind these calculations.

Among closely correlated names, LLY shows the strongest co-movement with PFE (0.32), JNJ (0.30), ABBV (0.29). Investors seeking diversification should note these correlation dynamics when constructing multi-asset portfolios.

True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure across all buyings — not individual stock metrics. The Portfolio Health Check quantifies this at the portfolio level: it surfaces hidden concentration, marginal CVaR contributions, and the degree to which your overall allocation deviates from an optimal risk-adjusted mandate. The LLY analysis here is a single node in that larger structure.

Is LLY a buy or sell in 2026?

Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) carries a Buy quantitative rating from A.L. Capital Advisory, derived from Discounted Cash Flow intrinsic value analysis, five-factor model scoring (Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, Size), and CVaR tail risk measurement. At $1,136.37, the DCF midpoint margin of safety is +8% (intrinsic value range: $865 bear – $1,579 bull). Composite factor score: 3.9/5. Strongest factor: Quality (5.0/5). Weakest factor: Value (2.0/5). Trailing P/E: 40.3x. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Portfolio Construction Framework →

What is the average analyst target price for LLY?

Wall Street consensus target for LLY: $1,215.79 (+7.0% upside from the current price of $1,136.37). The analyst target range spans $850.00 (most bearish) to $1,500.00 (most bullish). Consensus recommendation: Buy. Note that analyst price targets typically reflect a 12-month forward horizon and are derived from a blend of DCF, comparable-company, and sum-of-the-parts analysis. A.L. Capital Advisory’s quantitative Buy rating is produced independently — from DCF intrinsic value, five-factor model scores, and CVaR tail risk — and does not mechanically track Street consensus. When the two diverge, the divergence itself is informative: it can reflect differences in time horizon, valuation methodology, or the degree to which the current price already discounts the consensus case. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Monte Carlo Simulation Framework →

How does LLY score on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size?

LLY five-factor scores (A.L. Capital Advisory, 1–5 scale): Value 2.0/5 (below average) — measures current price versus DCF intrinsic range and trailing earnings multiples; Quality 5.0/5 (strong) — captures profitability metrics including return on equity, net margin (ROE: 107.5%) and net margin (35.0%); Momentum 3.0/5 (neutral) — reflects recent price trajectory and earnings surprise consistency; Volatility 4.5/5 (strong) — inverse measure derived from beta, where lower historical volatility earns a higher score; Size 5.0/5 (strong) — market capitalisation rank (mega-cap $1T+ scores 5/5). Composite: 3.9/5. Factor scores above 4.0 signal a tailwind in that dimension; below 2.0 signals a material headwind. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Black-Litterman Model →

What is LLY's tail risk and CVaR?

The 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) for LLY on a one-month horizon is -17.8%. CVaR represents the expected average loss in the worst 5% of monthly outcomes — a more conservative tail risk measure than standard VaR, which only marks the loss threshold. Beta of 0.52 indicates below-market volatility. For reference, a diversified S&P 500 ETF carries a one-month CVaR of roughly -8% to -12% in normal market conditions; individual equity CVaR is higher due to idiosyncratic risk. At the portfolio level, what matters is the marginal CVaR contribution of each holding — not its standalone figure. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies each position's marginal tail-risk contribution across your entire holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

What is LLY's intrinsic value and DCF price target?

A.L. Capital Advisory's DCF model produces an intrinsic value range of $865 (bear case) to $1,579 (bull case) for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). At $1,136.37, the midpoint margin of safety is +8% (positive = discount to intrinsic mid; negative = premium). The bear-to-bull spread reflects genuine sensitivity to the two dominant DCF inputs: the terminal growth rate and WACC. Terminal value typically accounts for 60-80% of total intrinsic value in most equity DCF models, which is why a range is more analytically sound than a point estimate. The central analytical question is not what the DCF outputs as a single number but which growth trajectory the current market price already discounts. All DCF analysis follows CFA Institute standards and is conducted by Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

What would trigger a rating upgrade or downgrade for LLY?

Upgrade trigger: Upgrade to Strong Buy on evidence of accelerating earnings surprise magnitude combined with improvement in the Value factor score — specifically if the current 40.3x P/E is supported by an upward revision to DCF terminal growth assumptions. Downgrade trigger: An earnings miss at current valuations (40.3x trailing P/E) where there is limited earnings cushion to absorb negative surprises; or a sustained reversal in the Quality and Momentum factor scores for two or more consecutive quarters. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Investment Policy Statement Framework →

Does LLY consistently beat earnings estimates?

LLY has beaten consensus EPS estimates in 12% of tracked quarterly periods — indicating inconsistent delivery. The most recent reported quarter beat consensus by 25.9%. Below-average earnings consistency is a primary headwind to the rating and a key watch item in the quantitative model. Earnings surprise magnitude and direction are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality dimensions of the five-factor scoring model. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

How does LLY contribute to portfolio risk and diversification?

LLY carries a beta of 0.52 (low-volatility / defensive relative to the broad equity market). A beta above 1.0 means the position amplifies market moves in both directions at a typical portfolio weight. Strongest peer co-movement: PFE (0.32), JNJ (0.30), ABBV (0.29). Holding LLY alongside these names in the same portfolio increases concentration risk. True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure — a single stock's beta does not reveal its marginal contribution to portfolio tail loss. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies concentration risk (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index), pairwise correlations, and marginal CVaR contribution across all your holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Ledoit-Wolf Covariance Framework →

What quantitative methodology does A.L. Capital Advisory use to analyse LLY?

A.L. Capital Advisory analyses Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) using a four-component quantitative framework grounded in CFA Institute standards. (1) DCF Valuation: projects free cash flows under bear and bull assumptions, discounts at WACC to produce an intrinsic value range with margin-of-safety calculation. (2) Five-Factor Scoring: each equity is scored 1–5 on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size. (3) CVaR Tail Risk: 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk from historical simulation of daily returns on a one-month horizon. (4) Earnings Surprise Analysis: quarterly beat rate and magnitude are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality factor scores. The current Buy rating for LLY is the output of applying this complete framework to current data. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →  ·  CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

Stress-Test This View Live

Run LLY in Asset Lens

Live DCF valuation, Monte Carlo simulation, options flow intelligence, and full factor decomposition — updated in real time. Free, no account required.

Launch Live Analysis →
Anton Ladnyi — Founder & Portfolio Architect, A.L. Capital Advisory, ex-Goldman Sachs, CFA
Anton Ladnyi, CFA
Founder & Portfolio Architect — A.L. Capital Advisory
Ex-Goldman Sachs Equity Research · Ex-J.P. Morgan Wealth Management · CFA Charterholder
Legal Disclaimer & Important Notices

This analysis is produced using a systematic quantitative framework applied to market data and does not constitute investment advice. Prose commentary is AI-assisted and generated from structured quantitative inputs. All data and metrics are as of 2026-06-11 and are point-in-time estimates subject to revision without notice. CVaR figures are based on historical simulation and do not guarantee future outcomes. DCF ranges and upgrade/downgrade triggers are forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and may not materialise. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This analysis does not account for individual circumstances, tax position, or investment objectives — consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. This content is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute regulated investment advice under MiFID II or FCA guidelines. This content is not intended for US persons or residents of jurisdictions where its distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. This service is not directed at residents of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, or Poland. The author may hold long or short positions in securities mentioned in this analysis. Nothing on this page represents a solicitation to buy or sell any security. A.L. Capital Advisory is an independent private advisory practice and is not affiliated with Eli Lilly and Company.

CFA Portfolio Advisory — LLY Discuss this analysis, position sizing, or your full portfolio mandate with Anton Ladnyi, CFA.