Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) Stock Analysis - Price Target, Buy Rating & DCF Valuation (2026)

FLUT — trading near 18x P/E after a 63% crash + FanDuel's #1 US share (39.6%) and international growth vs. structural prediction-market share-loss risk from Kalshi.

FLUT Price Target & Rating

FLUT's grade is Buy, with significant tail risk (CVaR -42.8%), and quality metrics (net margin -2%, ROE -5%). Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at $110.79 with a valuation grade of Buy: net margins of -2.2%, a DCF-implied intrinsic range of $88–$307 suggesting a +78% margin of safety, beta 1.09 (moderate risk profile).

FAIR RANGEPREMIUM BEAR$88.01BULL$306.84 BASE$158 CURRENT$111 MOS vs BASE+42.5% DCF VALUATION RANGE · FLUT
  • Valuation: Buy grade — DCF range $88–$307 implies +78% margin of safety
  • Risk: CVaR -42.8% (95th percentile, 1-month) indicates moderate tail exposure; beta of 1.09 amplifies broad market moves in both directions
  • Strengths: -2% net margin, -5% ROE dominate the factor profile
  • Catalyst: Q2 2026 earnings report (~August 6, 2026), coinciding with FLUT's sole primary NYSE listing taking effect after LSE delisting on August 3, 2026
  • Bear catalyst: A second FY26 guidance cut takes group Adjusted EBITDA meaningfully below the $2.865B midpoint, US sportsbook market share falls below 35%, or additional state tax hikes push US gross margin structurally lower.
FLUT — Quantitative Snapshot July 2026
RatingBuy
Price$110.79
Why BuyFactor profile supports upside — valuation premium reflects growth expectations
Main riskElevated tail risk — CVaR -42.8% on a one-month horizon
Tail riskCVaR -42.8% over one month at the 95th percentile
DCF range$88–$307 intrinsic range; margin of safety +78%
Best useCore large-cap Consumer Cyclical holding — not a source of diversified sector exposure
Next watchEarnings delivery consistency and margin trajectory
FLUT Quantitative Factor Radar Chart Pentagon radar chart showing FLUT factor scores: Value 3.0, Quality 1.0, Momentum 3.0, Volatility 3.0, Size 3.0 — each scored on a 1 to 5 scale. VALUE 3.0 QUALITY 1.0 MOMENTUM 3.0 VOLATILITY 3.0 SIZE 3.0
Value
3.0 / 5
Quality
1.0 / 5
Momentum
3.0 / 5
Volatility
3.0 / 5
Size
3.0 / 5
FLUT Key Metrics — Flutter Entertainment plc 2026
MetricValue
Current Price$110.79
Forward P/E12.2x
P/S Ratio1.1
EV/EBITDA14.6
Beta1.09
Net Margin-2.2%
ROE-5.0%
Debt/Equity129.4%
CVaR (95%, 1M)-42.8%
Market Cap$19.2B
Historical Simulation · Daily Log Returns
FLUT — Daily Return Distribution
Flutter Entertainment plc  ·  250 trading days  ·  CVaR illustrated on real data
Jul 2025 – Jul 2026 Daily log returns
Confidence level 95%
-4.22%
VaR · 95%
Max-loss threshold
-8.57%
CVaR · 95%
Avg loss in tail
12
Days in tail
of 250 sessions
250
Daily returns
Jul 2025 – Jul 2026
ℹ️
Risk Framework · A.L. Capital Advisory
CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology
Why variance understates downside risk in non-normal distributions — and how CVaR corrects that blind spot
Analyst View
Anton Ladnyi, CFA · A.L. Capital Advisory Updated 2026-07-09

FLUT — trading near 18x P/E after a 63% crash + FanDuel's #1 US share (39.6%) and international growth vs. structural prediction-market share-loss risk from Kalshi.

↑ Bull Case
  • 39.6% US sportsbook market share (vs. DraftKings' 35.3%) with FanDuel iGaming revenue up 19% YoY driving structural profit-pool expansion beyond single-game sports betting.
  • $18.3 billion FY26 group revenue guidance (~12% YoY growth) reaffirmed despite tax headwinds, with International Adjusted EBITDA of $587M in Q1 2026 growing on SNAI/Italy integration and MyCombo parlay penetration.
  • 71% average analyst upside implied by the ~$163 consensus price target (24 analysts), with 20 of 26 covering analysts still rating Buy/Outperform even after the selloff.
  • 28% Group iGaming revenue growth in Q1 2026 shows diversification away from volatile sportsbook hold rates, with 10% AMP growth in FanDuel iGaming.
  • $200-300 million FanDuel Predicts investment in 2026 leverages FanDuel's existing customer base to contest prediction markets rather than cede the category outright.
↓ Bear Case
  • 63% stock decline over the past year (52-week range $91.52-$313.69) reflects a structural derating on fears that Kalshi/Polymarket-style prediction markets permanently erode sportsbook hold and tax advantages.
  • 220 basis points of Q1 2026 US gross margin compression from New Jersey, Illinois, and Louisiana tax increases, with further state hikes a live risk into 2027.
  • $720 million in single-week NFL bets captured by Kalshi during the 2025-26 playoffs signals real volume migration to lightly-regulated exchanges at Flutter/DraftKings' expense.
  • 1% US sportsbook AMP decline YoY in Q1 2026 despite 6% revenue growth points to a shrinking active player base masked by pricing/promo mix, with consensus FY26 EPS cut from $6.78 to $5.14.
Catalyst: FanDuel Predicts shows real monetization traction with EBITDA drag narrowing below the low end of the $200-300M guided range, US sportsbook AMPs return to positive YoY growth, and Kalshi/prediction-market sports betting volume growth visibly decelerates.
Stop / exit: A second FY26 guidance cut takes group Adjusted EBITDA meaningfully below the $2.865B midpoint, US sportsbook market share falls below 35%, or additional state tax hikes push US gross margin structurally lower.
The model rates this a Buy, and the DCF case is real — the margin of safety is wide enough to absorb some delivery variance. That gives me more conviction here than the factor scores alone would suggest. The factor model flags quality as the weak link here, and it is right to. What I watch is return on capital — specifically whether the business can convert revenue growth into durable returns, not just reported earnings. That transition is the key to making the current rating look correct in hindsight. If the thesis holds across the next two quarters, I would be comfortable carrying this at a meaningful weight. If not — specifically, if margins disappoint or the earnings beat streak breaks — I would reduce before the market fully reprices.
— Anton Ladnyi, CFA
FLUT Earnings History — EPS Surprise Rate 2026
QuarterEPS Est.EPS ActualSurprise
Q1 2026$1.09$1.22+12.3%
Q4 2025$1.57$1.74+10.7%
Q3 2025$0.50$1.64+227.5%
Q2 2025$2.11$2.95+39.6%
$0.00$1.00$2.00$3.00$4.00 +39.6%+227.5%+10.7%+12.3% Q2'25Q3'25Q4'25Q1'26 BEAT RATE4/4 ESTIMATEBEATMISS EPS ACTUAL vs ESTIMATE · FLUT
FLUT Forward EPS Consensus Estimates 2026
QuarterEPS Est.YoY EPSAnalysts
Q2 2026$0.09-97.0%11
Q3 2026$0.80-50.9%11
Q4 2026~$3.81+119.0%19
Q1 2027~$0.99-18.9%10
~ Estimated from annual consensus — not a direct analyst survey
$0.00$1.00$2.00$3.00$4.00$5.00 -97%-51%+119%-19% Q2 2026Q3 2026Q4 2026Q1 2027 ESTIMATE TRENDCONTRACTING CONSENSUS EPSANALYST RANGEBased on 19 analyst estimates EPS FORWARD ESTIMATES · FLUT
FLUT Peer Valuation Comparison 2026
TickerP/E (TTM)Fwd P/EBetaCVaR-95Net Margin
FLUT12.2x1.09-42.8%-2.2%
DKNG292.1x15.4x1.64-35.8%93.2%
BKNG23.2x14.3x1.07-23.7%22.2%
ABNB36.3x24.2x1.14-13.6%19.9%
DIS15.4x12.8x1.40-10.1%11.5%
Hover each scenario for detail · current price $110.79
BEAR$70BASE$150BULL$230 $111 DCF SCENARIO RANGE · FLUT
Bear Case
$70
-36.8%
Fwd P/E: 12.3x
5% revenue CAGR · 12x exit multiple
Base Case
$150
+35.4%
Fwd P/E: 26.3x
10% revenue CAGR · 16x exit multiple
Bull Case
$230
+107.6%
Fwd P/E: 40.4x
15% revenue CAGR · 20x exit multiple
Pairwise Correlation Matrix — FLUT vs DKNG vs BKNG vs ABNB vs DIS 5×5 pairwise correlation matrix showing co-movement between FLUT, DKNG, BKNG, ABNB, DIS over a trailing 12-month window. FLUT DKNG BKNG ABNB DIS FLUT DKNG BKNG ABNB DIS 1.00 0.69 0.34 0.28 0.27 0.69 1.00 0.26 0.19 0.25 0.34 0.26 1.00 0.57 0.29 0.28 0.19 0.57 1.00 0.38 0.27 0.25 0.29 0.38 1.00
1 of 10 peer pairs correlated above 0.60 — diversification benefit within this cluster is structurally limited.
Extended Analysis — Buy, Hold or Sell? Risk Factors. Portfolio Fit.

Is FLUT a buy, hold, or sell?

FLUT carries a valuation grade of Buy. Our discounted cash flow model produces an intrinsic range of $88–$307 — implying a +78% margin of safety at the current price of $110.79. The width of the DCF range reflects genuine uncertainty in the terminal growth rate assumption: the correct framework is a probability-weighted distribution over scenarios, not a single point estimate. See the DCF valuation framework for full methodology.

With a 12% beat rate on recent quarters, earnings predictability has been mixed. The most recent quarter delivered a 12.3% earnings surprise. Analyst estimate revisions are trending downward.

What are FLUT's key risk factors?

With a beta of 1.09, FLUT exhibits a market-neutral risk profile relative to the broad market. The 95th-percentile CVaR of -42.8% on a one-month horizon should inform position sizing directly: at a 10% portfolio weight, this tail event contributes approximately 4.3% of total portfolio loss in the worst 5% of months. Net margins of -2.2% fall below the Consumer Cyclical sector average of 10%, suggesting margin pressure. Leverage is moderate with debt-to-equity at 129%.

At 0.71, the put/call ratio skews bullish, with call buyers dominating recent flow. Implied and realized volatility are roughly aligned at 54.8% and 50.5% respectively. Insiders have been net sellers to the tune of $22.4M recently. While routine dispositions are common, the magnitude bears watching. Short interest of 10.3% of float is elevated, reflecting meaningful bearish positioning.

How does FLUT fit in a diversified portfolio?

At typical HENRY portfolio weights — 10–20% of the equity allocation — FLUT carries a beta of 1.09, meaning it amplifies broad market moves proportionally. The appropriate weight is not a function of conviction alone, but of the full covariance structure across all holdings. See the Ledoit-Wolf covariance framework for the methodology behind these calculations.

Among closely correlated names, FLUT shows the strongest co-movement with DKNG (0.69), BKNG (0.34), ABNB (0.28). Investors seeking diversification should note these correlation dynamics when constructing multi-asset portfolios.

True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure across all holdings — not individual stock metrics. The Portfolio Health Check quantifies this at the portfolio level: it surfaces hidden concentration, marginal CVaR contributions, and the degree to which your overall allocation deviates from an optimal risk-adjusted mandate. The FLUT analysis here is a single node in that larger structure.

Is FLUT a buy or sell in 2026?

Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) carries a Buy quantitative rating from A.L. Capital Advisory, derived from Discounted Cash Flow intrinsic value analysis, five-factor model scoring (Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, Size), and CVaR tail risk measurement. At $110.79, the DCF midpoint margin of safety is +78% (intrinsic value range: $88 bear – $307 bull). Composite factor score: 2.6/5. Strongest factor: Value (3.0/5). Weakest factor: Quality (1.0/5). Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Portfolio Construction Framework →

What is the average analyst target price for FLUT?

Wall Street consensus target for FLUT: $159.93 (+44.4% upside from the current price of $110.79). The analyst target range spans $80.00 (most bearish) to $341.00 (most bullish). Consensus recommendation: Buy. Note that analyst price targets typically reflect a 12-month forward horizon and are derived from a blend of DCF, comparable-company, and sum-of-the-parts analysis. A.L. Capital Advisory’s quantitative Buy rating is produced independently — from DCF intrinsic value, five-factor model scores, and CVaR tail risk — and does not mechanically track Street consensus. When the two diverge, the divergence itself is informative: it can reflect differences in time horizon, valuation methodology, or the degree to which the current price already discounts the consensus case. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Monte Carlo Simulation Framework →

How does FLUT score on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size?

FLUT five-factor scores (A.L. Capital Advisory, 1–5 scale): Value 3.0/5 (neutral) — measures current price versus DCF intrinsic range and trailing earnings multiples; Quality 1.0/5 (weak) — captures profitability metrics including return on equity, net margin (ROE: -5.0%) and net margin (-2.2%); Momentum 3.0/5 (neutral) — reflects recent price trajectory and earnings surprise consistency; Volatility 3.0/5 (neutral) — inverse measure derived from beta, where lower historical volatility earns a higher score; Size 3.0/5 (neutral) — market capitalisation rank (mega-cap $1T+ scores 5/5). Composite: 2.6/5. Factor scores above 4.0 signal a tailwind in that dimension; below 2.0 signals a material headwind. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Black-Litterman Model →

What is FLUT's tail risk and CVaR?

The 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) for FLUT on a one-month horizon is -42.8%. CVaR represents the expected average loss in the worst 5% of monthly outcomes — a more conservative tail risk measure than standard VaR, which only marks the loss threshold. Beta of 1.09 indicates broadly market-level volatility. For reference, a diversified S&P 500 ETF carries a one-month CVaR of roughly -8% to -12% in normal market conditions; individual equity CVaR is higher due to idiosyncratic risk. At the portfolio level, what matters is the marginal CVaR contribution of each holding — not its standalone figure. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies each position's marginal tail-risk contribution across your entire holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

What is FLUT's intrinsic value and DCF price target?

A.L. Capital Advisory's DCF model produces an intrinsic value range of $88 (bear case) to $307 (bull case) for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT). At $110.79, the midpoint margin of safety is +78% (positive = discount to intrinsic mid; negative = premium). The bear-to-bull spread reflects genuine sensitivity to the two dominant DCF inputs: the terminal growth rate and WACC. Terminal value typically accounts for 60-80% of total intrinsic value in most equity DCF models, which is why a range is more analytically sound than a point estimate. The central analytical question is not what the DCF outputs as a single number but which growth trajectory the current market price already discounts. All DCF analysis follows CFA Institute standards and is conducted by Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

What would trigger a rating upgrade or downgrade for FLUT?

Upgrade trigger: Upgrade to Strong Buy on accelerating earnings momentum, improving factor scores, and a wider margin of safety. Downgrade trigger: a sustained reversal in the Quality and Momentum factor scores for two or more consecutive quarters. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Investment Policy Statement Framework →

Does FLUT consistently beat earnings estimates?

FLUT has beaten consensus EPS estimates in 12% of tracked quarterly periods — indicating inconsistent delivery. The most recent reported quarter beat consensus by 12.3%. Below-average earnings consistency is a primary headwind to the rating and a key watch item in the quantitative model. Earnings surprise magnitude and direction are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality dimensions of the five-factor scoring model. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

How does FLUT contribute to portfolio risk and diversification?

FLUT carries a beta of 1.09 (moderate-volatility relative to the broad equity market). A beta above 1.0 means the position amplifies market moves in both directions at a typical portfolio weight. Strongest peer co-movement: DKNG (0.69), BKNG (0.34), ABNB (0.28). Holding FLUT alongside these names in the same portfolio increases concentration risk. True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure — a single stock's beta does not reveal its marginal contribution to portfolio tail loss. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies concentration risk (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index), pairwise correlations, and marginal CVaR contribution across all your holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Ledoit-Wolf Covariance Framework →

What quantitative methodology does A.L. Capital Advisory use to analyse FLUT?

A.L. Capital Advisory analyses Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) using a four-component quantitative framework grounded in CFA Institute standards. (1) DCF Valuation: projects free cash flows under bear and bull assumptions, discounts at WACC to produce an intrinsic value range with margin-of-safety calculation. (2) Five-Factor Scoring: each equity is scored 1–5 on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size. (3) CVaR Tail Risk: 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk from historical simulation of daily returns on a one-month horizon. (4) Earnings Surprise Analysis: quarterly beat rate and magnitude are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality factor scores. The current Buy rating for FLUT is the output of applying this complete framework to current data. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →  ·  CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

Stress-Test This View Live

Run FLUT in Asset Lens

Live DCF valuation, Monte Carlo simulation, options flow intelligence, and full factor decomposition — updated in real time. Free, no account required.

Launch Live Analysis →
Anton Ladnyi — Founder & Portfolio Architect, A.L. Capital Advisory, ex-Goldman Sachs, CFA
Anton Ladnyi, CFA
Founder & Portfolio Architect — A.L. Capital Advisory
Ex-Goldman Sachs Equity Research · Ex-J.P. Morgan Wealth Management · CFA Charterholder
Legal Disclaimer & Important Notices

This analysis is produced using a systematic quantitative framework applied to market data and does not constitute investment advice. Prose commentary is AI-assisted and generated from structured quantitative inputs. All data and metrics are as of 2026-07-09 and are point-in-time estimates subject to revision without notice. CVaR figures are based on historical simulation and do not guarantee future outcomes. DCF ranges and upgrade/downgrade triggers are forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and may not materialise. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This analysis does not account for individual circumstances, tax position, or investment objectives — consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. This content is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute regulated investment advice under MiFID II or FCA guidelines. This content is not intended for US persons or residents of jurisdictions where its distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. This service is not directed at residents of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, or Poland. The author may hold long or short positions in securities mentioned in this analysis. Nothing on this page represents a solicitation to buy or sell any security. A.L. Capital Advisory is an independent private advisory practice and is not affiliated with Flutter Entertainment plc.

CFA Portfolio Advisory — FLUT Discuss this analysis, position sizing, or your full portfolio mandate with Anton Ladnyi, CFA.