RTX Corporation (RTX) Stock Analysis — Price Target, Hold Rating & DCF Valuation (2026)

RTX screens as lower-quality and fully priced — upside depends on sustained earnings execution at current multiples.

Valuation Grade
Hold
◆◆◆◇◇
Price  ·  Analyst Target
$196.42 → $216 +10%
P/E (TTM)
39.6x
Beta
0.43
Drawdown
-8.4%
CVaR-95
-5.9%
Intrinsic range: $172 — $247  ·  Margin of safety: +7%
RTX Price Target & Rating

RTX's quantitative grade is Hold, with limited downside risk (CVaR -5.9%), and quality metrics (net margin 8%, ROE 11%). RTX Corporation (RTX) trades at $196.42 with a valuation grade of Hold: a trailing P/E of 39.6x at a 80% premium to sector median, net margins of 7.6%, a DCF-implied intrinsic range of $172–$247 suggesting a +7% margin of safety, beta 0.43 (defensive risk profile).

  • Valuation: Hold grade — P/E 39.6x — DCF range $172–$247 implies +7% margin of safety
  • Risk: CVaR -5.9% (95th percentile, 1-month) indicates moderate tail exposure; beta of 0.43 amplifies broad market moves in both directions
  • Strengths: Size 4.5/5, 8% net margin, 11% ROE dominate the factor profile
  • Watch: Value score of 2.0/5 signals premium pricing
RTX — Quantitative Snapshot April 2026
RatingHold
Price$196.42
Why HoldHigh-quality business at a fully-priced valuation — limited margin for error on earnings
Main riskPremium multiple (39.6x P/E) demands consistent delivery
Tail riskCVaR -5.9% over one month at the 95th percentile
DCF range$172–$247 intrinsic range; margin of safety +7%
Best useCore large-cap Industrials holding — not a source of diversified sector exposure
Next watchEarnings surprise deceleration trend — monitor next quarter delivery closely
RTX Quantitative Factor Radar Chart Pentagon radar chart showing RTX factor scores: Value 2.0, Quality 1.0, Momentum 3.0, Volatility 5.0, Size 4.5 — each scored on a 1 to 5 scale. VALUE 2.0 QUALITY 1.0 MOMENTUM 3.0 VOLATILITY 5.0 SIZE 4.5
RTX Key Metrics — RTX Corporation 2026
MetricValue
Current Price$196.42
P/E Ratio (TTM)39.6x
Forward P/E26.1x
P/S Ratio3.0
EV/EBITDA20.2
Beta0.43
Net Margin7.6%
ROE11.0%
Debt/Equity59.5%
Dividend Yield1.39%
CVaR (95%, 1M)-5.9%
Market Cap$264.4B
RTX Earnings History — EPS Surprise Rate 2026
QuarterEPS Est.EPS ActualSurprise
Q4 2025$1.47$1.55+5.3%
Q3 2025$1.41$1.70+20.6%
Q2 2025$1.43$1.56+9.5%
Q1 2025$1.37$1.47+7.5%
RTX Peer Valuation Comparison 2026
TickerP/E (TTM)BetaCVaR-95Net Margin
RTX39.6x0.43-5.9%7.6%
LMT27.5x0.24-10.8%6.7%
NOC22.9x0.05-10.0%10.0%
GD21.8x0.39-5.4%8.0%
LHX41.1x0.75-6.1%10.4%
Analyst View Anton Ladnyi · A.L. Capital Advisory

RTX shows mixed quality signals in the factor model, at a fully-priced valuation with limited margin of safety. The four-quarter earnings beat streak is constructive.

RTX trades at 39.6x trailing earnings — 80% above the Industrials sector median of 22.0x. This combination — premium multiple, decelerating outperformance — is historically where risk/reward becomes asymmetric. Not a reason to sell; a reason to size carefully.

Upgrade trigger: A pullback that widens the margin of safety beyond +15% (approximately $146)
Downgrade trigger: An earnings miss at this valuation (39.6x P/E); or a sustained reversal in the Quality and Momentum factor scores
RTX is not a name I am actively adding to. The business quality is real, but at 40x I am already paying for a lot of the future, and the margin of safety does not justify conviction-sized exposure. What I pay attention to above all else is the earnings surprise trajectory. The beat streak is intact, but the magnitude has compressed from +7.5% to +5.3% — and at a 40x multiple, the market is not pricing in a miss. That asymmetry is worth respecting. A pullback of 10–15% from here would open the margin of safety enough that I would want to add. An earnings miss at the current multiple would do the opposite — that would be the signal to reduce rather than wait.
— Anton Ladnyi

Is RTX a buy, hold, or sell?

RTX carries a valuation grade of Hold. The trailing P/E of 39.6 sits 80% above the Industrials sector median of 22.0x — a premium that demands sustained earnings delivery. Our discounted cash flow model produces an intrinsic range of $172–$247 — implying a +7% margin of safety at the current price of $196.42. The width of the DCF range reflects genuine uncertainty in the terminal growth rate assumption: the correct framework is a probability-weighted distribution over scenarios, not a single point estimate. See the DCF valuation framework for full methodology.

RTX has beaten consensus estimates in 100% of recent quarters, signalling strong execution consistency. The most recent quarter delivered a 5.3% earnings surprise. Analyst estimate revisions are trending upward.

What are RTX's key risk factors?

With a beta of 0.43, RTX exhibits a low-volatility risk profile relative to the broad market. The 95th-percentile CVaR of -5.9% on a one-month horizon should inform position sizing directly: at a 10% portfolio weight, this tail event contributes approximately 0.6% of total portfolio loss in the worst 5% of months. Net margins of 7.6% fall below the Industrials sector average of 11%, suggesting margin pressure. The balance sheet is conservatively leveraged at 60% debt-to-equity.

At 0.64, the put/call ratio skews bullish, with call buyers dominating recent flow. Implied volatility of 32.5% exceeds realized volatility of 22.7% by 10 points, suggesting options are pricing in elevated risk. Insider transactions show net buying of $63.8M over the trailing period, a signal often associated with management confidence. Short interest is low at 1.0% of float, suggesting limited bearish conviction.

How does RTX fit in a diversified portfolio?

At typical HENRY portfolio weights — 10–20% of the equity allocation — RTX carries a beta of 0.43, meaning it amplifies broad market moves proportionally. The appropriate weight is not a function of conviction alone, but of the full covariance structure across all holdings. See the Ledoit-Wolf covariance framework for the methodology behind these calculations.

As a Industrials constituent, RTX's risk profile should be evaluated alongside sector peers when constructing diversified portfolios.

True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure across all holdings — not individual stock metrics. The Portfolio Health Check quantifies this at the portfolio level: it surfaces hidden concentration, marginal CVaR contributions, and the degree to which your overall allocation deviates from an optimal risk-adjusted mandate. The RTX analysis here is a single node in that larger structure.

Is RTX a buy or sell in 2026?

RTX Corporation (RTX) carries a Hold quantitative rating from A.L. Capital Advisory, derived from Discounted Cash Flow intrinsic value analysis, five-factor model scoring (Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, Size), and CVaR tail risk measurement. At $196.42, the DCF midpoint margin of safety is +7% (intrinsic value range: $172 bear – $247 bull). Composite factor score: 3.1/5. Strongest factor: Volatility (5.0/5). Weakest factor: Quality (1.0/5). Trailing P/E: 39.6x. Rating by Anton Ladnyi, CFA Charterholder (ex-Goldman Sachs Equity Research, ex-J.P. Morgan Wealth Management), A.L. Capital Advisory, Berlin. Full methodology: Portfolio Construction Framework →

What is the average analyst target price for RTX?

Wall Street consensus target for RTX: $215.66 (+9.8% upside from the current price of $196.42). The analyst target range spans $179.00 (most bearish) to $242.00 (most bullish). Consensus recommendation: Buy. Note that analyst price targets typically reflect a 12-month forward horizon and are derived from a blend of DCF, comparable-company, and sum-of-the-parts analysis. A.L. Capital Advisory’s quantitative Hold rating is produced independently — from DCF intrinsic value, five-factor model scores, and CVaR tail risk — and does not mechanically track Street consensus. When the two diverge, the divergence itself is informative: it can reflect differences in time horizon, valuation methodology, or the degree to which the current price already discounts the consensus case. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Monte Carlo Simulation Framework →

How does RTX score on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size?

RTX five-factor scores (A.L. Capital Advisory, 1–5 scale): Value 2.0/5 (below average) — measures current price versus DCF intrinsic range and trailing earnings multiples; Quality 1.0/5 (weak) — captures profitability metrics including return on equity, net margin (ROE: 11.0%) and net margin (7.6%); Momentum 3.0/5 (neutral) — reflects recent price trajectory and earnings surprise consistency; Volatility 5.0/5 (strong) — inverse measure derived from beta, where lower historical volatility earns a higher score; Size 4.5/5 (strong) — market capitalisation rank (mega-cap $1T+ scores 5/5). Composite: 3.1/5. Factor scores above 4.0 signal a tailwind in that dimension; below 2.0 signals a material headwind. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Black-Litterman Model →

What is RTX's tail risk and CVaR?

The 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) for RTX on a one-month horizon is -5.9%. CVaR represents the expected average loss in the worst 5% of monthly outcomes — a more conservative tail risk measure than standard VaR, which only marks the loss threshold. Beta of 0.43 indicates below-market volatility. For reference, a diversified S&P 500 ETF carries a one-month CVaR of roughly -8% to -12% in normal market conditions; individual equity CVaR is higher due to idiosyncratic risk. At the portfolio level, what matters is the marginal CVaR contribution of each holding — not its standalone figure. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies each position's marginal tail-risk contribution across your entire holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

What is RTX's intrinsic value and DCF price target?

A.L. Capital Advisory's DCF model produces an intrinsic value range of $172 (bear case) to $247 (bull case) for RTX Corporation (RTX). At $196.42, the midpoint margin of safety is +7% (positive = discount to intrinsic mid; negative = premium). The bear-to-bull spread reflects genuine sensitivity to the two dominant DCF inputs: the terminal growth rate and WACC. Terminal value typically accounts for 60-80% of total intrinsic value in most equity DCF models, which is why a range is more analytically sound than a point estimate. The central analytical question is not what the DCF outputs as a single number but which growth trajectory the current market price already discounts. All DCF analysis follows CFA Institute standards and is conducted by Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

What would trigger a rating upgrade or downgrade for RTX?

Upgrade trigger: A price pullback that opens the margin of safety beyond +15% (approximately $146 based on the DCF bear case). Downgrade trigger: An earnings miss at current valuations (39.6x trailing P/E) where there is limited earnings cushion to absorb negative surprises; or a sustained reversal in the Quality and Momentum factor scores for two or more consecutive quarters. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Investment Policy Statement Framework →

Does RTX consistently beat earnings estimates?

RTX has beaten consensus EPS estimates in 100% of tracked quarterly periods — indicating consistent delivery. The most recent reported quarter beat consensus by 5.3%. Sustained above-consensus delivery supports both the Momentum and Quality factor scores and provides a tailwind to the current rating. Earnings surprise magnitude and direction are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality dimensions of the five-factor scoring model. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

How does RTX contribute to portfolio risk and diversification?

RTX carries a beta of 0.43 (low-volatility / defensive relative to the broad equity market). A beta above 1.0 means the position amplifies market moves in both directions at a typical portfolio weight. True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure — a single stock's beta does not reveal its marginal contribution to portfolio tail loss. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies concentration risk (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index), pairwise correlations, and marginal CVaR contribution across all your holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Ledoit-Wolf Covariance Framework →

What quantitative methodology does A.L. Capital Advisory use to analyse RTX?

A.L. Capital Advisory analyses RTX Corporation (RTX) using a four-component quantitative framework grounded in CFA Institute standards. (1) DCF Valuation: projects free cash flows under bear and bull assumptions, discounts at WACC to produce an intrinsic value range with margin-of-safety calculation. (2) Five-Factor Scoring: each equity is scored 1–5 on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size. (3) CVaR Tail Risk: 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk from historical simulation of daily returns on a one-month horizon. (4) Earnings Surprise Analysis: quarterly beat rate and magnitude are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality factor scores. The current Hold rating for RTX is the output of applying this complete framework to current data. All analysis is conducted personally by Anton Ladnyi, CFA Charterholder (ex-Goldman Sachs Equity Research, ex-J.P. Morgan Wealth Management), founder of A.L. Capital Advisory, Berlin. CFA Charter: https://credentials.cfainstitute.org/5ff4f4bf-f1e6-4ca7-9ab2-aaed50ec2e43 Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →  ·  CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

Stress-Test This View Live

Run RTX in Asset Lens

Live DCF valuation, Monte Carlo simulation, options flow intelligence, and full factor decomposition — updated in real time. Free, no account required.

Launch Live Analysis →
Anton Ladnyi — Founder & Portfolio Architect, A.L. Capital Advisory, ex-Goldman Sachs, CFA
Anton Ladnyi
Founder & Portfolio Architect — A.L. Capital Advisory
Ex-Goldman Sachs Equity Research · Ex-J.P. Morgan Wealth Management · CFA Charterholder

This analysis is produced using a systematic quantitative framework applied to market data and does not constitute investment advice. Prose commentary is AI-assisted and generated from structured quantitative inputs. All data and metrics are as of 2026-04-17 and are point-in-time estimates subject to revision without notice. CVaR figures are based on historical simulation and do not guarantee future outcomes. DCF ranges and upgrade/downgrade triggers are forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and may not materialise. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This analysis does not account for individual circumstances, tax position, or investment objectives — consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. This content is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute regulated investment advice under MiFID II or FCA guidelines. This content is not intended for US persons or residents of jurisdictions where its distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. This service is not directed at residents of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, or Poland. The author may hold long or short positions in securities mentioned in this analysis. Nothing on this page represents a solicitation to buy or sell any security. A.L. Capital Advisory is an independent private advisory practice and is not affiliated with RTX Corporation.

CFA Portfolio Advisory — RTX Discuss this analysis, position sizing, or your full portfolio mandate with Anton Ladnyi, CFA.