Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) Stock Analysis — Price Target, Hold Rating & DCF Valuation (2026)

OBDC — cut dividend 16% to $0.31 (base), Moody's upgraded to Baa2, no new non-accruals; stock at -22.5% discount to NAV $14.41 with $300M buyback authorized

OBDC Price Target & Rating

OBDC's quantitative grade is Hold, with moderate downside risk (CVaR -11.4%), and quality metrics (net margin 20%, ROE 5%). Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) trades at $11.12 with a valuation grade of Hold: a trailing P/E of 15.9x at a 13% premium to sector median, net margins of 20.2%, a DCF-implied intrinsic range of $14–$23 suggesting a +67% margin of safety, beta 0.67 (defensive risk profile).

VALUEFAIR RANGEPREMIUM BEAR$14.48BULL$22.72 BASE$18 CURRENT$11 MOS vs BASE+65.8% DCF VALUATION RANGE · OBDC
  • Valuation: Hold grade — P/E 15.9x — DCF range $14–$23 implies +67% margin of safety
  • Risk: CVaR -11.4% (95th percentile, 1-month) indicates moderate tail exposure; beta of 0.67 amplifies broad market moves in both directions
  • Strengths: 20% net margin, 5% ROE dominate the factor profile
  • Catalyst: Q2 earnings — spread-widening deployment window update and new commitment pace; $300M buyback accretion vs. NAV; CLARITY Act stablecoin regulation (affects competitor OBDCs); Q2 base dividend coverage vs. $0.31 level
  • Bear catalyst: New non-accruals emerge OR base dividend cut again below $0.25/share
OBDC — Quantitative Snapshot June 2026
RatingHold
Price$11.12
Why HoldHigh-quality business at a fully-priced valuation — limited margin for error on earnings
Main riskValue score 2.5/5 signals premium pricing relative to peers
Tail riskCVaR -11.4% over one month at the 95th percentile
DCF range$14–$23 intrinsic range; margin of safety +67%
Best useCore mid-cap Financials holding — not a source of diversified sector exposure
Next watchEarnings surprise deceleration trend — monitor next quarter delivery closely
OBDC Quantitative Factor Radar Chart Pentagon radar chart showing OBDC factor scores: Value 2.5, Quality 2.0, Momentum 3.0, Volatility 4.5, Size 2.5 — each scored on a 1 to 5 scale. VALUE 2.5 QUALITY 2.0 MOMENTUM 3.0 VOLATILITY 4.5 SIZE 2.5
Value
2.5 / 5
Quality
2.0 / 5
Momentum
3.0 / 5
Volatility
4.5 / 5
Size
2.5 / 5
OBDC Key Metrics — Blue Owl Capital Corporation 2026
MetricValue
Current Price$11.12
P/E Ratio (TTM)15.9x
Forward P/E8.4x
P/S Ratio3.1
Beta0.67
Net Margin20.2%
ROE4.8%
Debt/Equity118.2%
Dividend Yield12.77%
CVaR (95%, 1M)-11.4%
Market Cap$5.5B
Analyst View
Anton Ladnyi, CFA · A.L. Capital Advisory Updated 2026-06-11

OBDC — cut dividend 16% to $0.31 (base), Moody's upgraded to Baa2, no new non-accruals; stock at -22.5% discount to NAV $14.41 with $300M buyback authorized

↑ Bull Case
  • Moody's upgraded to Baa2 (from Baa3) — only a few publicly traded BDCs hold this investment-grade rating; structural credit quality differentiator vs. FSK (junk)
  • No new non-accruals in Q1 2026 — stark contrast to BXSL (3 new non-accruals) and FSK (8.1% non-accrual ratio)
  • $300M share repurchase authorized — buyback at -22.5% discount to NAV creates meaningful accretion per share
  • Net leverage intentionally reduced to 1.13x (dry powder positioning) — management sees spread-widening environment as deployment opportunity
  • Software exposure reduced 19% → 16% via natural repayments — proactive risk reduction ahead of AI disruption concerns
  • Average LTV 47% — requires 53% of portfolio enterprise value to evaporate before losses crystallize; structural safety margin
  • Supplemental dividend framework retained: 50% of NII above $0.31 base paid as supplementals — upside participation preserved
↓ Bear Case
  • Dividend cut 16% to $0.31 (from $0.37 base) — market punished stock -6.21% in aftermarket on the announcement
  • Stock at ~$11.17 vs NAV $14.41 — -22.5% discount represents significant value destruction for existing holders
  • Q1 adj. NII $0.31/share missed consensus $0.35/share by ~11% — rate cut headwinds fully flowing through floating-rate book
  • 52-week range $10.52-$15.19 — stock near the bottom of its range despite credit quality differentiation
  • Net portfolio contraction in Q1 ($676M new commitments vs. $1.48B repayments) — deployment pipeline must accelerate
  • Three prior Fed cuts have compressed NII and without rate recovery, covered dividend ratio is structurally challenged
  • Trading at -22.48% discount to NAV $14.41 — steepest NAV discount among major BDCs, reflecting market pricing in continued portfolio stress and dividend sustainability concerns after 16% dividend cut to $0.31/share base
Catalyst: NII per share returns above $0.37 AND buyback reduces share count by 5%+ at deep NAV discount
Stop / exit: New non-accruals emerge OR base dividend cut again below $0.25/share
Hold means what it says here — I am not selling, but I am not buying either. The risk/reward at current prices is roughly balanced, and roughly balanced is not enough reason to deploy fresh capital. What I watch on this name is earnings consistency — specifically whether delivery against consensus is stable or deteriorating. That is usually where the rating gets confirmed or challenged before the price reflects it. A pullback of 10–15% from here would open the margin of safety enough that I would want to add. An earnings miss at the current multiple would do the opposite — that would be the signal to reduce rather than wait.
— Anton Ladnyi, CFA
OBDC Earnings History — EPS Surprise Rate 2026
QuarterEPS Est.EPS ActualSurprise
Q1 2026$0.35$0.32-8.1%
Q4 2025$0.36$0.37+4.3%
Q3 2025$0.39$0.37-5.7%
Q2 2025$0.40$0.42+6.4%
$0.00$0.20$0.40$0.60 +6.4%-5.7%+4.3%-8.1% Q2'25Q3'25Q4'25Q1'26 BEAT RATE2/4 ESTIMATEBEATMISS EPS ACTUAL vs ESTIMATE · OBDC
OBDC Forward EPS Consensus Estimates 2026
QuarterEPS Est.YoY EPSAnalysts
Q2 2026$0.32-24.5%10
Q3 2026$0.32-13.7%10
Q4 2026~$0.32-13.8%9
Q1 2027~$0.33+3.5%11
~ Estimated from annual consensus — not a direct analyst survey
$0.00$0.10$0.20$0.30$0.40 -25%-14%-14%+3% Q2 2026Q3 2026Q4 2026Q1 2027 ESTIMATE TRENDCONTRACTING CONSENSUS EPSANALYST RANGEBased on 11 analyst estimates EPS FORWARD ESTIMATES · OBDC
OBDC Peer Valuation Comparison 2026
TickerP/E (TTM)Fwd P/EBetaCVaR-95Net Margin
OBDC15.9x8.4x0.67-11.4%20.2%
ARCC11.7x9.9x0.62-10.6%37.3%
BXSL12.5x9.2x0.42-10.4%31.7%
FSK7.1x0.90-25.6%-38.7%
MAIN10.9x13.1x0.73-13.4%74.9%
Hover each scenario for detail · current price $11.12
BEAR$8BASE$12BULL$18 $11 DCF SCENARIO RANGE · OBDC
Bear Case
$8
-23.6%
Fwd P/E: 6.6x
-3% revenue CAGR · 6 exit multiple
Base Case
$12
+12.4%
Fwd P/E: 9.7x
5% revenue CAGR · 8 exit multiple
Bull Case
$18
+66.4%
Fwd P/E: 14.3x
12% revenue CAGR · 11 exit multiple
Pairwise Correlation Matrix — OBDC vs ARCC vs BXSL vs MAIN vs FSK 5×5 pairwise correlation matrix showing co-movement between OBDC, ARCC, BXSL, MAIN, FSK over a trailing 12-month window. OBDC ARCC BXSL MAIN FSK OBDC ARCC BXSL MAIN FSK 1.00 0.82 0.78 0.61 0.59 0.82 1.00 0.79 0.70 0.60 0.78 0.79 1.00 0.65 0.58 0.61 0.70 0.65 1.00 0.48 0.59 0.60 0.58 0.48 1.00
6 of 10 peer pairs correlated above 0.60 — diversification benefit within this cluster is structurally limited.
Extended Analysis — Buy, Hold or Sell? Risk Factors. Portfolio Fit.

Is OBDC a buy, hold, or sell?

OBDC carries a valuation grade of Hold. The trailing P/E of 15.9 sits 13% above the Financials sector median of 14.0x — a premium that demands sustained earnings delivery. Our discounted cash flow model produces an intrinsic range of $14–$23 — implying a +67% margin of safety at the current price of $11.12. The width of the DCF range reflects genuine uncertainty in the terminal growth rate assumption: the correct framework is a probability-weighted distribution over scenarios, not a single point estimate. See the DCF valuation framework for full methodology.

With a 6% beat rate on recent quarters, earnings predictability has been mixed. The most recent quarter missed by a 8.1% earnings surprise. Analyst estimate revisions are trending upward.

What are OBDC's key risk factors?

With a beta of 0.67, OBDC exhibits a defensive risk profile relative to the broad market. The 95th-percentile CVaR of -11.4% on a one-month horizon should inform position sizing directly: at a 10% portfolio weight, this tail event contributes approximately 1.1% of total portfolio loss in the worst 5% of months. Net margins of 20.2% fall below the Financials sector average of 28%, suggesting margin pressure. Leverage is moderate with debt-to-equity at 118%.

At 0.00, the put/call ratio skews bullish, with call buyers dominating recent flow. Insider transactions show net buying of $2.5M over the trailing period, a signal often associated with management confidence. Short interest is low at 4.1% of float, suggesting limited bearish conviction.

How does OBDC fit in a diversified portfolio?

At typical HENRY portfolio weights — 10–20% of the equity allocation — OBDC carries a beta of 0.67, meaning it amplifies broad market moves proportionally. The appropriate weight is not a function of conviction alone, but of the full covariance structure across all holdings. See the Ledoit-Wolf covariance framework for the methodology behind these calculations.

Among closely correlated names, OBDC shows the strongest co-movement with ARCC (0.82), BXSL (0.78), MAIN (0.61). Investors seeking diversification should note these correlation dynamics when constructing multi-asset portfolios. With the top peer correlation at 0.82, adding OBDC to a portfolio that already holds these names provides limited marginal diversification benefit — particularly during stress events when correlations converge toward 1.0.

True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure across all holdings — not individual stock metrics. The Portfolio Health Check quantifies this at the portfolio level: it surfaces hidden concentration, marginal CVaR contributions, and the degree to which your overall allocation deviates from an optimal risk-adjusted mandate. The OBDC analysis here is a single node in that larger structure.

Is OBDC a buy or sell in 2026?

Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) carries a Hold quantitative rating from A.L. Capital Advisory, derived from Discounted Cash Flow intrinsic value analysis, five-factor model scoring (Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, Size), and CVaR tail risk measurement. At $11.12, the DCF midpoint margin of safety is +67% (intrinsic value range: $14 bear – $23 bull). Composite factor score: 2.9/5. Strongest factor: Volatility (4.5/5). Weakest factor: Quality (2.0/5). Trailing P/E: 15.9x. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Portfolio Construction Framework →

What is the average analyst target price for OBDC?

Wall Street consensus target for OBDC: $13.31 (+19.7% upside from the current price of $11.12). The analyst target range spans $11.00 (most bearish) to $15.00 (most bullish). Consensus recommendation: None. Note that analyst price targets typically reflect a 12-month forward horizon and are derived from a blend of DCF, comparable-company, and sum-of-the-parts analysis. A.L. Capital Advisory’s quantitative Hold rating is produced independently — from DCF intrinsic value, five-factor model scores, and CVaR tail risk — and does not mechanically track Street consensus. When the two diverge, the divergence itself is informative: it can reflect differences in time horizon, valuation methodology, or the degree to which the current price already discounts the consensus case. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Monte Carlo Simulation Framework →

How does OBDC score on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size?

OBDC five-factor scores (A.L. Capital Advisory, 1–5 scale): Value 2.5/5 (neutral) — measures current price versus DCF intrinsic range and trailing earnings multiples; Quality 2.0/5 (below average) — captures profitability metrics including return on equity, net margin (ROE: 4.8%) and net margin (20.2%); Momentum 3.0/5 (neutral) — reflects recent price trajectory and earnings surprise consistency; Volatility 4.5/5 (strong) — inverse measure derived from beta, where lower historical volatility earns a higher score; Size 2.5/5 (neutral) — market capitalisation rank (mega-cap $1T+ scores 5/5). Composite: 2.9/5. Factor scores above 4.0 signal a tailwind in that dimension; below 2.0 signals a material headwind. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Black-Litterman Model →

What is OBDC's tail risk and CVaR?

The 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) for OBDC on a one-month horizon is -11.4%. CVaR represents the expected average loss in the worst 5% of monthly outcomes — a more conservative tail risk measure than standard VaR, which only marks the loss threshold. Beta of 0.67 indicates below-market volatility. For reference, a diversified S&P 500 ETF carries a one-month CVaR of roughly -8% to -12% in normal market conditions; individual equity CVaR is higher due to idiosyncratic risk. At the portfolio level, what matters is the marginal CVaR contribution of each holding — not its standalone figure. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies each position's marginal tail-risk contribution across your entire holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

What is OBDC's intrinsic value and DCF price target?

A.L. Capital Advisory's DCF model produces an intrinsic value range of $14 (bear case) to $23 (bull case) for Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC). At $11.12, the midpoint margin of safety is +67% (positive = discount to intrinsic mid; negative = premium). The bear-to-bull spread reflects genuine sensitivity to the two dominant DCF inputs: the terminal growth rate and WACC. Terminal value typically accounts for 60-80% of total intrinsic value in most equity DCF models, which is why a range is more analytically sound than a point estimate. The central analytical question is not what the DCF outputs as a single number but which growth trajectory the current market price already discounts. All DCF analysis follows CFA Institute standards and is conducted by Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

What would trigger a rating upgrade or downgrade for OBDC?

Upgrade trigger: A price pullback that opens the margin of safety beyond +15% (approximately $12 based on the DCF bear case); or a return to consistent above-consensus EPS delivery for two consecutive quarters. Downgrade trigger: a sustained reversal in the Quality and Momentum factor scores for two or more consecutive quarters. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Investment Policy Statement Framework →

Does OBDC consistently beat earnings estimates?

OBDC has beaten consensus EPS estimates in 6% of tracked quarterly periods — indicating inconsistent delivery. The most recent reported quarter missed consensus by 8.1%. Below-average earnings consistency is a primary headwind to the rating and a key watch item in the quantitative model. Earnings surprise magnitude and direction are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality dimensions of the five-factor scoring model. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →

How does OBDC contribute to portfolio risk and diversification?

OBDC carries a beta of 0.67 (low-volatility / defensive relative to the broad equity market). A beta above 1.0 means the position amplifies market moves in both directions at a typical portfolio weight. Strongest peer co-movement: ARCC (0.82), BXSL (0.78), MAIN (0.61). Holding OBDC alongside these names in the same portfolio increases concentration risk. True portfolio risk is a function of the full covariance structure — a single stock's beta does not reveal its marginal contribution to portfolio tail loss. The A.L. Capital Advisory Portfolio Health Check quantifies concentration risk (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index), pairwise correlations, and marginal CVaR contribution across all your holdings. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: Ledoit-Wolf Covariance Framework →

What quantitative methodology does A.L. Capital Advisory use to analyse OBDC?

A.L. Capital Advisory analyses Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) using a four-component quantitative framework grounded in CFA Institute standards. (1) DCF Valuation: projects free cash flows under bear and bull assumptions, discounts at WACC to produce an intrinsic value range with margin-of-safety calculation. (2) Five-Factor Scoring: each equity is scored 1–5 on Value, Quality, Momentum, Volatility, and Size. (3) CVaR Tail Risk: 95th-percentile Conditional Value at Risk from historical simulation of daily returns on a one-month horizon. (4) Earnings Surprise Analysis: quarterly beat rate and magnitude are incorporated into the Momentum and Quality factor scores. The current Hold rating for OBDC is the output of applying this complete framework to current data. Analysis by Anton Ladnyi, CFA (ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-J.P. Morgan) · A.L. Capital Advisory. Full methodology: DCF Valuation Framework →  ·  CVaR & Tail-Risk Methodology →

Stress-Test This View Live

Run OBDC in Asset Lens

Live DCF valuation, Monte Carlo simulation, options flow intelligence, and full factor decomposition — updated in real time. Free, no account required.

Launch Live Analysis →
Anton Ladnyi — Founder & Portfolio Architect, A.L. Capital Advisory, ex-Goldman Sachs, CFA
Anton Ladnyi, CFA
Founder & Portfolio Architect — A.L. Capital Advisory
Ex-Goldman Sachs Equity Research · Ex-J.P. Morgan Wealth Management · CFA Charterholder
Legal Disclaimer & Important Notices

This analysis is produced using a systematic quantitative framework applied to market data and does not constitute investment advice. Prose commentary is AI-assisted and generated from structured quantitative inputs. All data and metrics are as of 2026-06-11 and are point-in-time estimates subject to revision without notice. CVaR figures are based on historical simulation and do not guarantee future outcomes. DCF ranges and upgrade/downgrade triggers are forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and may not materialise. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This analysis does not account for individual circumstances, tax position, or investment objectives — consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. This content is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute regulated investment advice under MiFID II or FCA guidelines. This content is not intended for US persons or residents of jurisdictions where its distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. This service is not directed at residents of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, or Poland. The author may hold long or short positions in securities mentioned in this analysis. Nothing on this page represents a solicitation to buy or sell any security. A.L. Capital Advisory is an independent private advisory practice and is not affiliated with Blue Owl Capital Corporation.

CFA Portfolio Advisory — OBDC Discuss this analysis, position sizing, or your full portfolio mandate with Anton Ladnyi, CFA.